atw: Re: OT: WARNING: Recruiter advertisements are ONLY trawling for resumes for tender responses!

  • From: "Kent, Christine" <Christine.Kent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:16:28 +1000

 

The amazing thing is that in the senate votes, virtually no-one knows where the 
preferences go if you put the ‘1’ for the party above the line. At the last two 
elections I’ve asked the booth staff and all of the folk handing out 
how-to-votes. Nobody knew and the only people who were able to rummage out the 
info were the Greens. 

 

Get-Up actually did provide information on this an election or two back – they 
made a big thing of it.  

 

Easy answer for both upper and lower house is to number the whole damn lot 
yourself.  I always do that just to make sure the parties cannot do corrupt 
deals to determine where my vote goes – not that my one vote matters much but 
one can always hope the idea goes into the group mind.

 

I also understand that preferences only flow down 3 levels, so if you have 5 or 
6 on your card, I don’t recall exactly, you can number those you know have no 
chance whatever of winning as 1, 2 and 3, and after that, your vote is tossed – 
doesn’t actually make logical sense, but one can live in hope that it works 
that way.  Does anyone know if it still works this way?

 

Williamstown was a great electorate for this.  Their right wing candidate was 
the labor candidate and everyone else – and there were usually lot, were 
further left than labor (not hard these days).  You knew the labor candidate 
was going to win so you picked any other three as 1, 2, 3 etc – with the labor 
candidate the last preference.

 

So, it is now unlawful to vote with clear intention, but you can vote the lazy 
way and not know who’s getting your vote. Great!! (where’s that new sarcastic 
font?)

 

Cheers,

Terry

Other related posts: