There is a similarly priced target from BasICColor called "dcam target+", only it has more patches and has an integrated light-trap, something that came up on this list in previous discussions about an ideal target. It's printed on Fuji Digital Paper semimatt. In this regard the ColorChecker SG should be better. Has anyone tried to use it with Argyll? I understand, that the values in the .cie reference file will have to be rearranged. The file says a Barbieri Spectro100xy was used.
kind regards nino nino@xxxxxxxx +972(0)527-673-119 On 8/3/2011 3:36 AM, nino loss wrote:
What would be in favor of the ColorChecker SG? The semi gloss? nino@xxxxxxxx +972(0)527-673-119 On 8/3/2011 3:31 AM, adam k wrote:How about colorchecker from Xrite? Sent from iPhone 4 On Aug 2, 2011, at 7:10 PM, "Guy K. Kloss"<guy.kloss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 9:22:32 AM Pascal de Bruijn wrote:I personally like the CMP Digital Target: http://www.cmp-color.fr/eng%20digital%20target.html I have the old 3 target, not the new version 4... But the target has two advantages, 1 there are a lot of patches, and actually more important it's a matte target, which means getting proper exposures without any reflections is pretty easy.+1Similar experience here. In many cases the Wolf Faust target (which I also like) was just too glossy and was quite bothersome in use. My experience is also only with the Digital Target 003, but I suppose the production style(media used) has remained the same.Just make sure you take good care of the surface of it, and keep it nicelywrapped in the protective/shielding envelopes it's shipped in. Guy -- Guy K. Kloss School of Computing + Mathematical Sciences Auckland University of Technology Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142 phone: +64 9 921 9999 ext. 5032 eMail: Guy.Kloss@xxxxxxxxx
