[argyllcms] Re: Using an i1 to measure FWA content?

  • From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:56:04 +1100

Martin Weberg wrote:
UV filtered readings having higher response below ~420nm. How is that?

It's hard to know, but the UV filter case has a dilemma - you don't
want to illuminate bellow 420 nm, but how do you measure reflectance
below 420 nm ? So the result is probably something of a compromize and
fudge. For UV included/FWA the result is the apparent reflectance
of illuminating it with UV below 420nm.

Graeme Gill.


Other related posts: