[argyllcms] Re: Using an i1 to measure FWA content?

  • From: Martin Weberg <martin.weberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:04:16 +0100

2010/2/8 Roger <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Could very well be that UV response is not actually higher below 420nm. Did
> you compare without UV filtration?

The original observation was: UV filtered reading was high below 420nm
while no filter and FWA compensation was low. Since UV filtered
readings contain no UV (10-400nm) I thought it was interesting that
the Spectrolino fitted with UV filter produced higher reflectance then
without filter below 420nm.

Martin Weberg

Other related posts: