[argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- From: Jan-Peter Homann <homann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:01:10 +0200
Hello Roger
Here in Germnay the ECI 2002 Target is very succesfully used for
profiling flexo.
It contains 3% steps for every colorcombinations and 1,5% for pure CMYK.
For getting good flexoresults the linearization incl. bumpup is the key.
The bumpup is needed to get a well defined first printing point.
The linearization is needed to correct the middle-tones offset-like
typical results file->print in germany are:
1%->0%
2%->7% (bumpup)
50%->66% (linearization for offset TVI)
Most flexo-printers get offset-data, which has to be converted to flexo.
This could be solved with a devicelink from argyll. Input-data could be
SWOP and destination-data your flexo-values.
:-) Jan-Peter
Roger Breton schrieb:
If your profiling target has 2% and you don't use a bump curve that
linearizes the *printed* highlights, you will have values starting at
15% or so; basically you'll be using your profile as a rudimentary
linearization, which is not its function.
Roberto,
How do you propose to use a bump curve that linearize a 2% dot on press?
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
--
--
homann colormanagement ------ fon/fax +49 30 611 075 18
Jan-Peter Homann ------------- mobile +49 171 54 70 358
Kastanienallee 71 ------- http://www.colormanagement.de
10435 Berlin --------- mailto:homann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- From: Roger Breton
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- From: Roger Breton
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
If your profiling target has 2% and you don't use a bump curve that linearizes the *printed* highlights, you will have values starting at 15% or so; basically you'll be using your profile as a rudimentary linearization, which is not its function.
Roberto,
How do you propose to use a bump curve that linearize a 2% dot on press?
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
- [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- From: Roger Breton
- [argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses
- From: Roger Breton