[argyllcms] Re: Profiling flexo presses

> If instead of that, you keep the original readings (device->pcs table)
> and when you want to find a device value for an original PCS point,
> you do a reverse interpolation (I know what I want to say, but doubt
> this is proper wording!) in the device space, you have much more
> precision.
> That's what the Imation CFM did (although I never saw evidence of
> better quality!), and that's one of the options of Argyll CMM.

You will have to give an example of this technique, Roberto? Of what Imation
CMM did?

First, where do you keep the original readings?

Second, to do the reverse interpolation mean I have to search manually the
Device values that correspond to the PCS value I want to match? Have you
ever done this yourself? It may be fine for some spot color but not for a
whole image.

Regards,

Roger Breton  |  Laval, Canada  |  graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx

Other related posts: