Thank you everybody for taking your time and replies. I'll keep my u2410 at 80 cd/m^2 because it is very bright otherwise. Just out of curiosity I mat try 120 also. A Kielcz On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:02 PM, Roger Breton <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ISO-12646 suggests that 80 is good Luminance for screen to proof, even > today. 120 can be used too. > > Bottom line, trust the adapting visual mechanism to show us a good visual > match to a proof, even at the lower calibrated luminance. > > / Roger > > -----Original Message----- > From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Philip Reed > Sent: February-02-12 7:49 PM > To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Monitor calibration > > Hi Adam, > > 80 is quite a bit dimmer than 120. I have a Dell Ultrasharp U2711 and > calibrate to 120. If I went with 80, I would not be able to see detail in > the dark areas or shadows and I get good matches with my prints. This > however seems to be a very subjective topic and also depends on your ambient > lighting conditions. I tend to edit photos at night with no artificial > lights. > > Regards - Phil (no guru either) > > -----Original Message----- > From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of adam k > Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 7:35 PM > To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Monitor calibration > > I know that this group is full of gurus. I'm novice though. Is 80 > cd/m^2 brighter than 120 cd/m^2? > > A Kielcz > > On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:35 PM, "János, Tóth F." <janos666@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> It does make sense for me as my plasma display can not reach more than >> ~85 cd/m^2 anyway. But this is enough in a dark room. >> 80 cd/m^2 is a little too bright for web pages with bright backgrounds >> and black text but usually optimal for most of the movies and games. >> In a dark room which is actually not that dark if you have white walls >> and there is something on a relatively big display... >> > > >