Jason Campbell wrote: >Since I understand what both of you are saying, is there a way I can get >anywhere with a perceptual intent built by feeding in a synthetic (fake) >profile out of argyll? I am going out on a limb here not exactly sure this >makes much sense, but at the end of the day, I need... > >If I query a Lab near paper, then I get near 0/0/0/0... >If I query a Lab near solid, then I get near 100/100/100/0... >If I query a Lab somewhere in between, I get a best estimate of the CMY build >to yield that Lab... Jason, can You just tune Your printing process in hardware with aim to produce 100/100/100/0% color which will "satisfy" ArgyllCMS as deepest neutral black? For example, tune the densities of inks on the media to achieve for 300% the color equivalent to the current 260% total inks. This can solve Your problem because allows to build correct profile with true 300% deepest and neutral CMY black point. Another way is to apply the calibration curves to Your CMY. Total 300% inks after applying calibration to CMY(K) data become 260% "hardware" inks. So You can use in Your software desired 300% best black but fiddle the hardware with calibrated data, with 260% actual black. So, Your secret software always will see 300% CMY at Lab=0 point but hardware actually will print colorimetric-correct black of 260%.