[argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 14:07:25 +1000
Alastair M. Robinson wrote:
Gerhard Fuernkranz wrote:
please notice, that obviously in the dev. snapshot the meaning of the
-c and -d numbers has changed and that the former "-c3" is now called
"-c4".
I'd missed that completely - no wonder my prints were coming out darker
than I expected!
Hmm. Probably a good reason to use GNU style
--options-that-go-on-forever-and-
you-cant't-remember-them-and-you-command-line-overflows, but I rather detest
them,
so I won't.
I did extend the intent option to take a symbolic value as well
as a number, so that the standard ICC style intents can be selected
in a way that won't change with each release. (-ia, -ir, -ip and -is).
Graeme Gill.
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- From: Alastair M. Robinson
- [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- From: Ben Goren
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- » [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
please notice, that obviously in the dev. snapshot the meaning of the -c and -d numbers has changed and that the former "-c3" is now called "-c4".
Hmm. Probably a good reason to use GNU style --options-that-go-on-forever-and- you-cant't-remember-them-and-you-command-line-overflows, but I rather detest them, so I won't.
- [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- From: Alastair M. Robinson
- [argyllcms] Re: DTP41 and Linux
- From: Ben Goren