On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Pascal de Bruijn wrote: >> >> The profile made with GretagMacbeth software seems a lot more natural. Am >> I missing some option in Argyll? Or is this because Argyll isn't >> primarily targeted >> at making camera profiles? > > Sorry, but "a lot more natural" leaves little scope for investigation. > Using what raster file ? Using what reference ? Used in what way ? > (profiles are typically used in pairs to do device to device colorspace > conversion). Used in what applications ? Evaluated on what criteria ? The following archive should contain everything of interest: http://files.pcode.nl/temp/argyll/canon_eos400d_testcase.zip I'm using the profile in UFRaw (using LCMS). I'm testing the above profiles as a camera input profile. I'm saving to sRGB using a perceptual rendering intent, and I'm using a display profile generated by ArgyllCMS (Using a X-Rite Huey), also with a perceptual rendering intent. @Bob, I'd really appreciate it, if you could generate a profile using Profile Prism, I'd love to compare. Regards, Pascal de Bruijn