[arachne] Re: New Arachne 1.90

  • From: "Eric S. Emerson" <sernemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:48:37 -5000

Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!

Hi Brian,
          I am running Arachne 1.90J1-387 and I
find it to be pretty much bug free. However,
if you wish help from this list then you must
be more specific describing your problems.
I personally run Arachne with pictures turned
off and without a mouse on a 486 machine on
a RAM drive. It is much faster using this
configuration than my W$dze 98 233Mhz Pentium
machine.

Eric


On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 00:06:26 -0400, Brian C. Murphy wrote:

> Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!

> When I configured the latest mainfestation of A190 GPL, I found that it w
> as
> extremely buggy.  I had to revise a log of Arachne.CFG using coding from
> much earlier versions and even then it did not work well, was extremely
> slow even with a RAM drive, and I believe would not upload files on line 
> (I
> will have to recheck that when time permits)  Meantime the old reliable
> A170R3 works well and I have configured A173 which also seems to work wel
> l.
> I will be systematically re-checking the remaining GPL versions and taki
> ng
> notes of performance and will uplod my finding to this list.  (That will
> take awhile, so don't hold your breath.)         

-- This mail was written by a user of the Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/

                  Arachne at FreeLists                  
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --

Other related posts: