[access-uk] Re: PenFriend Update
- From: "Barry G" <lister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:44:45 +0100
John, my first instinctive reaction is - please, please, please make the labels
more magnetic than the strips similar to dymo tape and the sheets of magnetic
material sold by RNIBthus far - they just haven't got the oomph to hold onto
things well, especially curved or irregular surfaces!
And please don't abandon the laundry label project - it's close but no cigar
yet...
All the best,
Barry G
----- Original Message -----
From: John
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 6:21 PM
Subject: [access-uk] PenFriend Update
Hello Everyone,
We are in the process of defining the spec for our PenFriend magnetic labels.
These are for use with tins obviously as well as things like sticking on the
fridge for messages or other appliances to remind you what knobs to press.
So we are interested in your views as prospective customers.
You can send comments privately to me or Alison of course but we'd quite like
to see a debate develop where ideas and concerns can be bounced around on the
list.
We would be interested in basic things like size and shape. How big should
they ideally be and would there be any benefit in having a specific shape or
range of shapes or sizes? how many recordings you might want to put onto one
label and anything else you want to say about them.
This is not a scientific survey and we will be using other means to hear from
other potential customers but the folks on this list have always been very
creative with suggestions for the Penfriend and you don't just tell us you are
grateful for anything we offer you. Believe it or not we like customers who
challenge us because that's how things get improved.
Our supplier has told us we should get our first sew on label samples for the
laundry in a couple of weeks from China.We'll let you know when they get here.
John
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4498 (20091011) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4498 (20091011) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
Other related posts:
