Well, that's my understanding also David. We'll wait for the RNIB to clarify or disagree with this. -- Carol carol.pearson29@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx On Twitter: http://twitter.com/songbird49a ---- Original Message ---- From: David Russell To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 10:01 PM Subject: [access-uk] Re: PenFriend Update > But you cannot use them for four different tins. If you > record on the second part of what was once one large > label it will change what you put on the first part. If > the penfriend thinks that large label is sausage and you > change it to beans, then the first label used becomes > beans as well. > > I hope I am not being really stupid here. > > John or alison please correct me if I am talking rubbish. > > > David > -----Original Message----- > From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dean Wilcox > Sent: 13 October 2009 21:11 > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [access-uk] Re: PenFriend Update > > > Yes, they are identical, just one label made into four. > The advantage is that if you have a lot of large labels > that you don't want to use because the smaller ones suit > the task you can at least make them usable. What you do > with the three remaining bits of each label is something > else, I'm sure if you saved them they could come in use > in the future. Or maybe you have many of the same > tinned food and want to use them for beans, peas, tomato > soup, tuna etc. > > At 19:52 13/10/2009, you wrote: > > But, surely, if you cut a large label into four, they > will all say the same thing when you activate them with > penfriend? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ > mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dean Wilcox > Sent: 13 October 2009 19:27 > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [access-uk] Re: PenFriend Update > > Its worth saying that in the RNIB's Penfriend tips sheet > it does say you can cut the large labels into four to > make four identical labels. Hopefully that will help > some. > > At 23:09 11/10/2009, you wrote: > > I think tins may stack better if labels (so a fairly long > strip) could be put down the side of each tin rather than > on top. I personally do like to be able to use larger > labels for some items (especially where I've given more > verbal information than just a name). > > To give us choice seems to be the right way to go, but > maybe, eventually, you should be able to provide a whole > pack of each size so that we have a choice when ordering. > Some may find that they don't use a particular size of > label and would prefer not to have to buy one.) > > -- > Carol > carol.pearson29@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > On Twitter: http://twitter.com/songbird49a > > ---- Original Message ---- > From: John > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 6:21 PM > Subject: [access-uk] PenFriend Update > > > Hello Everyone, > > We are in the process of defining the spec for our > > PenFriend magnetic labels. These are for use with tins > > obviously as well as things like sticking on the fridge > > for messages or other appliances to remind you what > > knobs to press. > > So we are interested in your views as prospective > > customers. > > You can send comments privately to me or Alison of > > course but we'd quite like to see a debate develop > > where ideas and concerns can be bounced around on the > > list. > > We would be interested in basic things like size and > > shape. How big should they ideally be and would there be > > any benefit in having a specific shape or range of > > shapes or sizes? how many recordings you might want to > > put onto one label and anything else you want to say > > about them. This is not a scientific survey and we will > > be using other means to hear from other potential > > customers but the folks on this list have always been > > very creative with suggestions for the Penfriend and > > you don't just tell us you are grateful for anything we > > offer you. Believe it or not we like customers who > > challenge us because that's how things get improved. > > Our supplier has told us we should get our first sew on > > label samples for the laundry in a couple of weeks from > > China.We'll let you know when they get here. > > John > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.14.4/2416 - > Release Date: 10/05/09 18:23:00 > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version > of virus signature database 4504 (20091013) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version > of virus signature database 4504 (20091013) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.14.4/2416 - > Release Date: 10/05/09 18:23:00 > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version > of virus signature database 4504 (20091013) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version > of virus signature database 4504 (20091013) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com