Yes your right, what I meant was if you have four tins of beans or four packs of sausages you could use the four labels made for the same things.
At 22:01 13/10/2009, you wrote:
But you cannot use them for four different tins. If you record on the second part of what was once one large label it will change what you put on the first part. If the penfriend thinks that large label is sausage and you change it to beans, then the first label used becomes beans as well.I hope I am not being really stupid here. John or alison please correct me if I am talking rubbish. David -----Original Message-----From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dean WilcoxSent: 13 October 2009 21:11 To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Re: PenFriend UpdateYes, they are identical, just one label made into four. The advantage is that if you have a lot of large labels that you don't want to use because the smaller ones suit the task you can at least make them usable. What you do with the three remaining bits of each label is something else, I'm sure if you saved them they could come in use in the future. Or maybe you have many of the same tinned food and want to use them for beans, peas, tomato soup, tuna etc.At 19:52 13/10/2009, you wrote:But, surely, if you cut a large label into four, they will all say the same thing when you activate them with penfriend?-----Original Message-----From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dean WilcoxSent: 13 October 2009 19:27 To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Re: PenFriend UpdateIts worth saying that in the RNIB's Penfriend tips sheet it does say you can cut the large labels into four to make four identical labels. Hopefully that will help some.At 23:09 11/10/2009, you wrote:I think tins may stack better if labels (so a fairly long strip) could be put down the side of each tin rather than on top. I personally do like to be able to use larger labels for some items (especially where I've given more verbal information than just a name).To give us choice seems to be the right way to go, but maybe, eventually, you should be able to provide a whole pack of each size so that we have a choice when ordering. Some may find that they don't use a particular size of label and would prefer not to have to buy one.)-- Carol <mailto:carol.pearson29@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>carol.pearson29@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx On Twitter: <http://twitter.com/songbird49a>http://twitter.com/songbird49a ---- Original Message ---- From: John To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 6:21 PM Subject: [access-uk] PenFriend Update > Hello Everyone, > We are in the process of defining the spec for our > PenFriend magnetic labels. These are for use with tins > obviously as well as things like sticking on the fridge > for messages or other appliances to remind you what knobs > to press. > So we are interested in your views as prospective > customers. > You can send comments privately to me or Alison of course > but we'd quite like to see a debate develop where ideas > and concerns can be bounced around on the list. > We would be interested in basic things like size and > shape. How big should they ideally be and would there be > any benefit in having a specific shape or range of shapes > or sizes? how many recordings you might want to put onto > one label and anything else you want to say about them. > This is not a scientific survey and we will be using > other means to hear from other potential customers but > the folks on this list have always been very creative > with suggestions for the Penfriend and you don't just > tell us you are grateful for anything we offer you. > Believe it or not we like customers who challenge us > because that's how things get improved. > Our supplier has told us we should get our first sew on > label samples for the laundry in a couple of weeks from > China.We'll let you know when they get here. > John No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.14.4/2416 - Release Date: 10/05/09 18:23:00__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4504 (20091013) __________The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. <http://www.eset.com>http://www.eset.com__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4504 (20091013) __________The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. <http://www.eset.com>http://www.eset.com No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.14.4/2416 - Release Date: 10/05/09 18:23:00__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4504 (20091013) __________The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. <http://www.eset.com>http://www.eset.com__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4504 (20091013) __________The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. <http://www.eset.com>http://www.eset.com No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.14.4/2416 - Release Date: 10/05/09 18:23:00
