[x500standard] FW: Operational security
- From: "Erik Andersen" <era@xxxxxxx>
- To: "Directory list" <x500standard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "SG17-Q2" <tsg17q2@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:38:44 +0200
Hi Folks,
I never got any reaction on below message and I gave up resolving the
issue myself due to lack of time. If there is redundant information in
the Bind, it will stay there, at least for a while.
Erik Andersen
Andersen's L-Service
Mobile: +45 20 97 14 90
e-mail: era@xxxxxxx
http://www.x500.eu <http://www.x500.eu/>
<http://www.x500standard.com/> http://www.x500standard.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Andersen [mailto:era@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 1. maj 2008 18:05
To: Directory list; SG17-Q2 (tsg17q2@xxxxxxx)
Subject: Operational security
Hi Folks,
I seem to be continuously tangling with old litter from the Operational
Security amendment. It has cost me an enormous amount of time, first to
try to clean it up and having failed on that then to clean it out.
I believe, we still have something left in the Bind. I have produces a
small piece of text to show the difference between the current state of
Bind and how it looked in the second (1993) edition. Most of what has
been added we want to keep, but some should probably be deleted. Could
you please advice me on what to keep and what to bin?
Erik Andersen
Andersen's L-Service
Mobile: +45 20 97 14 90
e-mail: <mailto:era@xxxxxxx> era@xxxxxxx
<http://www.x500.eu/> http://www.x500.eu
<http://www.x500standard.com/> http://www.x500standard.com/
Other related posts:
