Welcome, Craig! W --- In quickphilosophy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Craig T. Spratt" <ctspratt@...> wrote: > > As I have just joined, I would be disappointed to see the group discontinue > soon. I don't have friends who would want to participate in or start up such > a group. I was pleased to hear from the moderator that this group exists. > His commentary I would definitely regret missing. I am happy to comment, but > I don't see myself as trying to lead opinion, but instead as one who will > have a fair amount of clarity-seeking questions. Now, I am ploughing my way > through Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France (part of the > political philosophy portion of my overall philosophy reading). So I am more > ready right now for an article-length read or two in this group, as opposed > to a book length read. Just a short while ago, I read E.J. Lowe's > Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind and J. L. Austin's Sense and > Sensibilia, so I do also read material that it seems this group may tend > toward. Tractatus would have been interesting to me, rather than too well > understood, so I'm sorry I missed it. But after the Burke, I would be > willing to read what this group plans to read, unless it's very far from my > interests. I'm a practicing lawyer, not a philosophy Ph.D. or professor, but > philosophy is a strong interest of mine. > > > > _____ > > From: quickphilosophy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:quickphilosophy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of walto > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 6:55 PM > To: quickphilosophy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [quickphilosophy] Next Up > > > > > > If nobody has anything further to say about the Tractatus, I will tomorrow > make my suggestions for possible a second read, and also ask for (i) > additional suggestions, and (ii) whether this group should continue at all > or be deep-sixed. It may be that we have not hit a "tipping point" in > members or that the members we have are already over-committed to other > groups, or that the Tractatus was simply not interesting enough or too well > understood already to sustain much confab. But if I'm going to have to make > 3/4 or more of the posts on every book and so few comments (regardless of > who makes them) get any response at all, my sense is that we don't have > critical mass or sufficient interest to continue. > > If any of you DO want to continue with community reads of philosophy books > in which you have some interest, I recommend that you try to get a > philosophy friend or two (who is/are not either nuts or overly aggressive) > to sign up! > > Best, > > W >