I wanted to alert list readers to a graphic novel entitled Logicomix, an Epic Search for Truth. Here's a picture of the cover: http://coffeeshopsnet.blogspot.com/2010/05/buzz-about-shops.html Some of the art within: http://www.flickr.com/photos/17157315@N00/4608127370/ The plot line is on two levels, akin to 'Titanic' (the movie) in that there's a contemporary cast, the people actually doing the comic, and the 1900s cast. Bertrand Russell frames the latter by telling his life story in a lecture hall, with the audience mostly wanting to hear his views on whether the USA should enter WW2 against Germany. Most of those present are vocally against this idea and know Russell is a pacifist, so want to hear him take their side. However, in the contemporary cast is a computer scientist who is keen to keep the logic and mathematics front and center. He debates with the other authors regarding focus and themes. Wittgenstein is prominent in these pages, although the storyline only takes us through Logico-Tractatus and Vienna Circle. Philosophical Investigations is not mentioned. This is a fictional work and does not follow the literal facts of what happened. There's a movie-like dimension, which isn't to say a graphic novel is just a storyboard for a film (my friend who gave me this to read talked at length about how upset the 'Watchmen' and 'V for Vendetta' guy was with any movie adaptation of his work). Wittgenstein pops his head into Russell's office and proceeds to be intense and passionate, sometimes challenging Russell's patience while also digging under the foundations of his ideas. LW then goes to the front lines (existentially as well as literally), then later sends the manuscript for the TLP. The school teacher scene shows him being a badass with the kids i.e. physically abusive. In contrast, Russell and his new wife are trying out their liberal ideas about schooling. Russell judges their experiment a failure. A core theme of the work is the relationship between logic and madness or rationality and irrationality. Russell's quest for certainty is set against the backdrop of a lonely childhood wherein truths are deliberately kept from him. This core theme traces back to Greek philosophy, including some of the great tragedies. A contemporary cast member is involved with the staging of these plays, Orestes in particular. How to reconcile these countervailing aspects of the human psyche? http://www.flickr.com/photos/17157315@N00/4608126464/sizes/l/in/photostream/ Those intimately familiar with the more factual biographies of the 1900s cast may feel too many liberties are taken w/r to what actually transpired. The authors are mostly wanting to get across some ideas and see the historical narrative as somewhat secondary. In interludes wherein the contemporary cast has discussions, we learn more about their focus and commitment to getting the ideas to come through accurately, with changes to facts a tool for doing that. An addendum explains this again, with a quote from El Greco. I no longer have said tome in front of me, having lent it to someone else. It came from our local library. I cite this work at Math Forum, where I post a lot of my thinking. http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=7067602&tstart=0 (author names and publisher given). Kirby ========================================== Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/