--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Anna Boncompagni <anna.boncompagni@...> wrote: > > I have nothing against the cogito as it is used in everyday life - > of course in everyday life we don't talk of "cogito", but we do > talk of internal states and feelings, of thought, of mindfulness, > we use these concepts as tools in our relations with others. > > My opinion is that problems arise when > 1) we try to have a scientific approach to these concepts, for in > this attempt we overlapp different linguistic games and different > meanings > 2) we think about the cogito philosophically, for analisying the > concept in philosophical terms leads to solipsism and skepticism. > > And of course, I think many strange and wonderful things too, and > make lots of mistakes! Lots! OK, then let's make some more mistakes together. I mean, here we are on a Wittgenstein discussion list, so let me see if I can understand how that fits. Perhaps you are suggesting that the grammars and language games, are NOT about the "cogito", as we are calling it? Josh