I agree with David. Light Red-tailed. The best mark to look for on Ferruginous is the wide gape. The corner of the mouth will extend behind the eye like a smile. This does not vary but plumage does. Great mark to use when sorting out the many plumages of Red-tailed Hawks. Glad you got such clear photos. Mark Korducki, New Berlin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Schwalbe" <p.g6schwalbe@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Birdnet, Wis" <wisbirdn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 10:25 PM Subject: [wisb] A Ferruginous in our backyard, ridiculous! > Dear Birders: > Tuesday, 24 Apr 14 we were finishing up our lunch, jumping out of her > chair > and rushing to the kitchen window, Glenna said "What just dropped into the > yard, what is that?" > > Paul, come here quick!. > > I looked. Quick the cameras! (Yes, we keep our bins and cameras on the > kitchen table). > > What we saw was very pale, and huge. We have had lots of Red-tailed Hawks > in our back yard (we have a small woodlot) but this bird was quite a bit > larger than any Red-tails we have seen. This bird was a light phase > juvenile Ferruginous Hawk (see photos). > > We just couldn't get a good shot through all of the trees, but each of us > finally got one that shows some of the field marks. There was a gray > squirrel less than a yard away from the bird, that then jumped on a tree. > Was the hawk after the squirrel? Before it left, it seemed to pick > something off the ground but we never did see it eat anything. > > The ID items were: Almost pure white feathered tarsus down to the toes, > with just a few dark flecks below the edge of the wing (see photos). The > under parts were white as far as we could see. No belly band as a > Rough-legged would have. > > The bird then flew off and landed in a tree up the lake a ways. I grabbed > my camera and went down to the lake shore hoping to get some more photos. > When I got there, I could see the bird in a tree and was able to get a > couple of front view and back view shots. It then flew off away from me, > and I did get some flight pics, but they are not in good focus. > > The front view shows completely white underparts, from the base of the > lower mandible down the breast, belly, and to the tail. The feathered > tarsus can be seen in the back views, and in the not so good flight shots, > extensive white streaked upper primary feathers, white base of the tail, > and a dusky/brown subterminal tail band are all visible. > > Sorry I couldn't get this out sooner, I had trouble working with Flickr. > The bird was last seen flying north out of Pardeeville toward Montello, so > keep your eyes open Daryl. > > Nine pictures can be seen at: > https://www.flickr.com/photos/paul-w-schwalbe. > Click on the image # for text. > > Good birding......................... Paul & Glenna > > -- > Paul & Glenna Schwalbe > Pardeeville, Columbia Co. > > > #################### > You received this email because you are subscribed to the Wisconsin > Birding Network (Wisbirdn). > To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: > //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn > To set DIGEST or VACATION modes, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: > //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn > Visit Wisbirdn ARCHIVES at: //www.freelists.org/archives/wisbirdn > > > #################### You received this email because you are subscribed to the Wisconsin Birding Network (Wisbirdn). To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn To set DIGEST or VACATION modes, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn Visit Wisbirdn ARCHIVES at: //www.freelists.org/archives/wisbirdn