[windows2000] Re: OT: IT-budgeting and PHBs - Long (Was: Can't DCs be ghosted??)
- From: Jim Kenzig <jimkenz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 10:08:37 -0500
Yeah an occasional yank of the network cable on a critical server is always
good job security. ;)
JK
-----Original Message-----
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Angus Macdonald
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:37 AM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: OT: IT-budgeting and PHBs - Long (Was: Can't
DCs be ghosted??)
It sounds to me that what you need is a "demonstration" of what could
happen. Yes it may be slightly unprofessional but it may be the only =
way to
get the message across. My organisation only discovered how dependant =
it was
on email when the server was out of action for four days. They listened =
to
my advice after that, at least for a while.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sorin Srbu [mailto:sorin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 08 January 2003 13:29
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] OT: IT-budgeting and PHBs - Long (Was: Can't DCs
be ghosted??)
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 04:22:28 -0800, Charles R. Buchanan wrote:
>Personally I think your boss needs his/her head examined. :-O I take =
it
>that there is way more than 5000USD worth of equipment in there, =
correct?
>Also just how much money will be lost if that equipment has a massive
>failure (heat related)? How much would the company have to spend to =
replace
>the equipment and how much money will be lost productivity wise? =
Sounds
like
>5000 dollars isn't all that much after all IMO. :-)
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
