At this point I am going ahead with WavePCI. WaveCyclic seems to be an easier implementation, but it seems like WavePCI will be better in the long run since I will have more control and better performance since I'll be avoiding the copies.
Thanks for the reply. Preston On Mar 30, 2009 1:04pm, Tim Roberts <timr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Cheng-mean Liu (SOCCER) wrote:
For
HD Audio solution, you want to use WaveRT port, which has
the benefits of both WavePCI and WavePCI – without redundant data copy
and mapping
and unmapping hassels.
He did quite clearly say that he was targeting XP SP3, where WaveRT is
not an option.
--
Tim Roberts, timr@xxxxxxxxx
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
