[uupretirees] Voting rights

  • From: Eric Russell <ericprussell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Simons, William" <William.Simons@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Bill Scheuerman <bscheuerm@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Uupretirees Yahoogroups <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 20:37:29 +0000

Here's a minority most of us have not even considered.  They can claim that 
many of the new restrictions violate the A D A.  Of course, as injured parties, 
they would have standing before the court.  Eric

G.O.P. Bills Rattle Disabled Voters: ‘We Don’t Have a Voice Anymore’

Legislation across the country would restrict voting methods and accommodations 
that people with disabilities are disproportionately likely to rely on.

  *   
<https://www.facebook.com/dialog/feed?app_id=9869919170&link=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2021%2F06%2F14%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fdisability-voting-rights.html%3Fsmid%3Dfb-share&name=G.O.P.%20Bills%20Rattle%20Disabled%20Voters%3A%20%E2%80%98We%20Don%E2%80%99t%20Have%20a%20Voice%20Anymore%E2%80%99&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F>
  *   
<https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=G.O.P.%20Bills%20Rattle%20Disabled%20Voters%3A%20%E2%80%98We%20Don%E2%80%99t%20Have%20a%20Voice%20Anymore%E2%80%99%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2021%2F06%2F14%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fdisability-voting-rights.html%3Fsmid%3Dwa-share>
  *   
<https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2021%2F06%2F14%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fdisability-voting-rights.html%3Fsmid%3Dtw-share&text=G.O.P.%20Bills%20Rattle%20Disabled%20Voters%3A%20%E2%80%98We%20Don%E2%80%99t%20Have%20a%20Voice%20Anymore%E2%80%99>
  *   
<mailto:?subject=NYTimes.com%3A%20G.O.P.%20Bills%20Rattle%20Disabled%20Voters%3A%20%E2%80%98We%20Don%E2%80%99t%20Have%20a%20Voice%20Anymore%E2%80%99&body=From%20The%20New%20York%20Times%3A%0A%0AG.O.P.%20Bills%20Rattle%20Disabled%20Voters%3A%20%E2%80%98We%20Don%E2%80%99t%20Have%20a%20Voice%20Anymore%E2%80%99%0A%0ALegislation%20across%20the%20country%20would%20restrict%20voting%20methods%20and%20accommodations%20that%20people%20with%20disabilities%20are%20disproportionately%20likely%20to%20rely%20on.%0A%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2021%2F06%2F14%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fdisability-voting-rights.html%3Fsmid%3Dem-share>
  *

Introducing a new way to share articles

As a Times subscriber, you now get 10 gift articles to share each month. Anyone 
can read them, even if they’re not a Times subscriber.


  *
  *
  *   374

[https://static01.nyt.com/images/2021/06/11/us/politics/00disability-vote1/merlin_188884545_57338c94-87fe-4c71-8cfd-5de90972af98-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale]
[Susie Angel, who has cerebral palsy, fears that a bill Republicans plan to 
push through the Texas Legislature will make it harder for her and others with 
disabilities to vote.]
Susie Angel, who has cerebral palsy, fears that a bill Republicans plan to push 
through the Texas Legislature will make it harder for her and others with 
disabilities to vote.Credit...Matthew Busch for The New York Times
[Maggie Astor]<https://www.nytimes.com/by/maggie-astor>

By Maggie Astor<https://www.nytimes.com/by/maggie-astor>

Published June 14, 2021Updated June 15, 2021

The experience was so demeaning that Susie Angel did not vote again for two 
decades.

It was 1991, she recalled, and she was a 21-year-old learning to live 
independently with cerebral palsy, which she has had since birth. She waited in 
line at her polling place in Austin, Texas, for hours. Then she waited for a 
poll worker who could help her complete her ballot. Finally, the worker refused 
to take her aside, making her name her preferred candidates in full view and 
earshot of other voters.

Ms. Angel, who has limited use of her limbs and a speech impairment and uses a 
foot-operated power wheelchair, left understanding that, unlike other 
Americans, she couldn’t vote privately. It was only when she began working for 
the Coalition of Texans With Disabilities in 2010, and learned about the 
adaptive equipment available to her, that she was able to vote independently — 
an experience that brought her to tears.

Now, Ms. Angel is watching the Texas Legislature pursue sweeping voting 
restrictions, afraid that she and others with disabilities might again be 
deterred from voting.

“They’re really making it so we don’t have a voice anymore,” she said. “And 
without that, we can’t get the things that we need to survive.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main 
story<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/14/us/politics/disability-voting-rights.html?campaign_id=56&emc=edit_cn_20210614&instance_id=32992&nl=on-politics-with-lisa-lerer&regi_id=119134593&segment_id=60673&te=1&user_id=519dd6e477b61db01b6c076d7c57e756#after-story-ad-1>

The Texas 
legislation<https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=87R&Bill=SB7>,
 which Democrats 
blocked<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/31/us/politics/texas-voting-bill.html
but Republicans plan to 
revive<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/31/us/politics/texas-voting-bill-.html
in a special session, is one of a series of Republican voting bills that would 
disproportionately affect people with disabilities. The Wisconsin Senate 
approved three last week with more to come, though unlike in Texas, the 
governor there is a Democrat and is expected to veto them. 
Georgia<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/25/us/politics/georgia-voting-law-republicans.html>
 and 
Florida<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/29/us/politics/florida-voting-rights-bill.html>
 have enacted similar measures.

For years, advocates have worked to mobilize Americans with disabilities — more 
than 38 million of whom are eligible to vote, according to researchers at 
Rutgers 
University<https://smlr.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/Documents/Centers/Program_Disability_Research/Disability_electorate_projections_2020.pdf>
 — into a voting bloc powerful enough to demand that politicians address their 
needs. Now, after an election in which mail-in voting helped them turn out in 
large numbers, the restrictive proposals are simultaneously threatening their 
rights and testing their nascent political influence.

“It’s only been the last few years that there have been studies done showing 
that if candidates would appeal to issues that the disability community cares 
about, there is such a thing as the disability vote,” said Bob Kafka, an 
organizer with Rev Up Texas, which aims to increase turnout among disabled 
Texans. “That’s why you’re seeing it playing out in Georgia and here and other 
places where the disability community is part of the larger fight against voter 
suppression.”

The fight also underscores the degree to which disability rights, once 
championed both by Democrats like former Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa and 
Republicans like former Senator Bob Dole of Kansas, have become one more 
partisan football, even though there are millions of disabled voters in both 
parties.

Editors’ Picks
<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/17/business/buying-a-car-online-carvana.html?action=click&algo=identity&block=editors_picks_recirc&fellback=false&imp_id=243232042&impression_id=801dc650-d13c-11eb-868b-4f7f78bbba65&index=0&pgtype=Article&pool=editors-picks-ls&region=ccolumn&req_id=637944625&surface=home-featured&variant=0_identity&action=click&module=editorContent&pgtype=Article&region=CompanionColumn&contentCollection=Trending>
Happy to Shun Showrooms, Millennials Storm the Car Market
<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/t-magazine/ppow-art-gallery.html?action=click&algo=identity&block=editors_picks_recirc&fellback=false&imp_id=638383065&impression_id=801ded60-d13c-11eb-868b-4f7f78bbba65&index=1&pgtype=Article&pool=editors-picks-ls&region=ccolumn&req_id=637944625&surface=home-featured&variant=0_identity&action=click&module=editorContent&pgtype=Article&region=CompanionColumn&contentCollection=Trending>
The Last Downtown Gallery
<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/19/style/subway-tuna-sandwich-lawsuit.html?action=click&algo=identity&block=editors_picks_recirc&fellback=false&imp_id=802780877&impression_id=801e1470-d13c-11eb-868b-4f7f78bbba65&index=2&pgtype=Article&pool=editors-picks-ls&region=ccolumn&req_id=637944625&surface=home-featured&variant=0_identity&action=click&module=editorContent&pgtype=Article&region=CompanionColumn&contentCollection=Trending>
The Big Tuna Sandwich Mystery
Continue reading the main 
story<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/14/us/politics/disability-voting-rights.html?campaign_id=56&emc=edit_cn_20210614&instance_id=32992&nl=on-politics-with-lisa-lerer&regi_id=119134593&segment_id=60673&te=1&user_id=519dd6e477b61db01b6c076d7c57e756&action=click&module=editorContent&pgtype=Article&region=CompanionColumn&contentCollection=Trending#after-pp_edpick>

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main 
story<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/14/us/politics/disability-voting-rights.html?campaign_id=56&emc=edit_cn_20210614&instance_id=32992&nl=on-politics-with-lisa-lerer&regi_id=119134593&segment_id=60673&te=1&user_id=519dd6e477b61db01b6c076d7c57e756#after-story-ad-2>

The most recent version of the Texas bill would ban drive-through voting, 
further limit absentee voting in a state that already has strict eligibility 
rules, and let poll 
watchers<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/01/us/politics/republican-pollwatchers.html>
 record video of voters as purported evidence of wrongdoing. Disability rights 
advocates worry that partisan poll watchers will misinterpret legal 
accommodations — like a worker helping a disabled voter complete a ballot, or a 
blind voter using a screen reader — as fraud.

[https://static01.nyt.com/images/2021/06/11/us/politics/00disability-vote3/merlin_188884578_f9b86e6d-da28-4f1f-bea5-c2ad623f6b98-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale]
Image[The most recent version of a Texas bill would further limit absentee 
voting in a state that already has some of the country’s strictest eligibility 
rules.]
The most recent version of a Texas bill would further limit absentee voting in 
a state that already has some of the country’s strictest eligibility 
rules.Credit...Matthew Busch for The New York Times

Bills in Wisconsin would restrict who could return voters’ ballots on their 
behalf; weaken accommodations for “indefinitely 
confined<https://elections.wi.gov/node/6788>” voters, who cannot vote in person 
because of age, illness or disability; limit ballot drop boxes and restrict 
their locations, effectively reducing their accessibility to voters with 
disabilities; and forbid municipal clerks to correct small mistakes on ballot 
envelopes.

Breaking many of the new rules would be a felony — a characteristic of bills in 
several states that advocates said could discourage people from helping friends 
or neighbors.

“It’s made organizations like ours start questioning, ‘Should we do that?’ 
because a simple mistake on our end could put them in jeopardy and our 
organization in jeopardy,” said Chase Bearden, deputy executive director of the 
Coalition of Texans With Disabilities. “That’s a pretty chilling effect.”

A spokesman for State Senator Bryan Hughes, the lead author of the Texas 
legislation, did not respond to a request for comment. State Senator Duey 
Stroebel of Wisconsin, who is sponsoring some of the bills there, called them 
“a reasonable balancing of priorities.”

“I want to ensure that self-certifying as indefinitely confined is not a de 
facto workaround to election integrity measures already on the books,” Mr. 
Stroebel said, adding of the limits on who could return ballots: “Any current 
practice for an individual who is not engaging in orchestrated mass ballot 
harvesting should be allowed by our bill. Also, a voter can simply return the 
ballot by mail.”

At the same time, some disabled voters have found it difficult even to express 
their opposition.

In Georgia and Florida, some who wanted to speak at public hearings couldn’t 
because they were at high risk from the coronavirus. Olivia Babis, a senior 
public policy analyst at Disability Rights Florida, said one voter had attended 
a hearing but, because of a speech impediment, struggled to make her points in 
the allotted 60 seconds.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main 
story<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/14/us/politics/disability-voting-rights.html?campaign_id=56&emc=edit_cn_20210614&instance_id=32992&nl=on-politics-with-lisa-lerer&regi_id=119134593&segment_id=60673&te=1&user_id=519dd6e477b61db01b6c076d7c57e756#after-story-ad-3>

Both states’ bills passed but face legal challenges. Last month, three 
disability rights groups joined a 
lawsuit<https://thearc.org/georgia-disability-groups-join-fight-voter-law/
arguing that Georgia’s law violated the Americans With Disabilities Act in 
addition to, as the original plaintiffs alleged, the Constitution and the 
Voting Rights 
Act<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/15/us/politics/texas-voting-rights-bill.html>
 of 1965.

Ms. Babis expressed particular concern about Florida’s new rules on absentee 
ballot applications (people must apply every election cycle instead of every 
two, a significant obstacle because many counties’ websites are inaccessible to 
people with disabilities) and signature matching (partisan poll watchers can 
inspect ballot envelopes, including signatures).

“People with disabilities are disproportionately affected by signature matching 
as it stands anywhere,” Ms. Babis said, noting that visual impairments, brain 
injuries and other disabilities can prevent people from signing their name 
consistently. “Now we’re throwing more people in to potentially challenge 
signatures, who don’t necessarily have expertise in handwriting analysis.”

The Georgia 
law<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/02/us/politics/georgia-voting-law-annotated.html>
 replaced signature matching with a requirement that absentee voters submit the 
number from a state ID, which poses its own obstacles for disabled voters who 
don’t have a driver’s license and cannot easily get to an office to obtain an 
ID.

Lobbying by disability groups has had some impact.

In Wisconsin last month, legislators modified some proposals that had alarmed 
disabled voters. For instance, in the initial version of one bill, voters who 
needed help returning their ballot would have had to get it from an immediate 
family member or legal guardian if they had one in Wisconsin. If a disabled 
voter in Milwaukee had a sibling in Ashland, 350 miles away, it would have been 
illegal to rely on a neighbor.

The bill was amended to allow people to designate someone other than a family 
member, regardless of whether they had family in-state — but no individual 
could return more than two non-relatives’ ballots.

Another measure in Wisconsin would have required anyone under 65 who applied 
for indefinitely confined status to provide a doctor’s note. Republicans said 
this would prevent people from claiming the status fraudulently, and pointed to 
the Milwaukee and Dane County clerks’ statements early last year that, because 
of a statewide stay-at-home order, any voter could claim it. After the 
Wisconsin Supreme Court ordered them to stop, the clerks rescinded that advice. 
The court later 
affirmed<https://apnews.com/article/madison-wisconsin-elections-coronavirus-pandemic-courts-5f4b607cb19928953ee09d4dde246f0c>
 that individual voters could decide whether they qualified.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main 
story<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/14/us/politics/disability-voting-rights.html?campaign_id=56&emc=edit_cn_20210614&instance_id=32992&nl=on-politics-with-lisa-lerer&regi_id=119134593&segment_id=60673&te=1&user_id=519dd6e477b61db01b6c076d7c57e756#after-story-ad-4>

According to the Wisconsin Elections 
Commission<https://www.wispolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/D.-November-2020-Election-Data-Report-Updated.pdf>,
 80 percent of people who claimed the status last year had ID on file.

Disabled voters expressed concern that, beyond the difficulty of finding 
transportation to appointments, the measure would require doctors to attest to 
matters outside their scope of practice — and that insurers might refuse to 
cover office visits to obtain such notes, deeming them medically unnecessary.

[https://static01.nyt.com/images/2021/06/11/us/politics/00disability-vote2/merlin_189055398_76a25097-b678-4cef-b004-2255c727e488-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale]
Image
[Denise Jess prefers to vote in person because polling places are required to 
have accessible equipment for visually impaired voters to complete ballots 
independently.]
Denise Jess prefers to vote in person because polling places are required to 
have accessible equipment for visually impaired voters to complete ballots 
independently.Credit...Marla Bergh for The New York Times

Denise Jess, the executive director of the Wisconsin Council of the Blind and 
Visually Impaired, said she worried that her doctor wouldn’t even be willing to 
make an assessment about her ability to travel to a polling place.

The Battle Over Voting Rights

After former President Donald J. Trump returned in recent months to making 
false claims that the 2020 election was stolen from him, Republican lawmakers 
in many states have marched 
ahead<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/30/us/politics/florida-voting-rights-bill-republicans.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup>
 to pass laws making it harder to vote and change how elections are run, 
frustrating Democrats and even some election officials in their own party.

  *
     *   A Key 
Topic<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/02/briefing/andrew-cuomo-myanmar-nigeria-students-kidnapped.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup>:
 The rules and procedures of elections have become central issues in American 
politics. As of May 14, lawmakers had passed 22 new laws in 14 states to make 
the process of voting more difficult, according to the Brennan Center for 
Justice<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-may-2021>,
 a research institute.
     *   The Basic Measures: The restrictions vary by state but can include 
limiting the use of ballot drop boxes, adding identification requirements for 
voters requesting absentee ballots, and doing away with local laws that allow 
automatic registration for absentee voting.
     *   More Extreme 
Measures:<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/27/us/republican-voter-suppression.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup>
 Some measures go beyond altering how one votes, including tweaking Electoral 
College and judicial election rules, clamping down on citizen-led ballot 
initiatives, and outlawing private donations that provide resources for 
administering elections.
     *   
Pushback:<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/30/us/politics/voting-rights-law.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup>
 This Republican effort has led Democrats in Congress to find a way to pass 
federal voting laws. A sweeping voting rights 
bill<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/30/us/politics/voting-rights-law.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup>
 passed the House in March, but faces difficult obstacles in the Senate, 
including from Joe Manchin III, Democrat of West 
Virginia<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/06/us/politics/joe-manchin-op-ed.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup>.
 Republicans have remained united against the proposal and even if the bill 
became law, it would most likely face steep legal 
challenges<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/05/us/voting-rights-bill-legal.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup>.
     *   
Florida:<https://www.nytimes.com/article/florida-voting-law.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup>
 Measures here include limiting the use of drop boxes, adding more 
identification requirements for absentee ballots, requiring voters to request 
an absentee ballot for each election, limiting who could collect and drop off 
ballots, and further empowering partisan observers during the ballot-counting 
process.
     *   
Texas:<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/10/us/politics/texas-voting-rights-bill.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup>
 Texas Democrats successfully blocked the state’s expansive voting bill, known 
as S.B. 7, in a late-night walkout and are starting a major statewide 
registration 
program<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/08/us/politics/texas-voter-registration-democrats.html?action=click&action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup&module=In%20Other%20News&pgtype=Homepage>
 focused on racially diverse communities. But Republicans in the state have 
pledged to return in 
<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/31/us/politics/texas-voting-bill-.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup>
 a special 
session<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/31/us/politics/texas-voting-bill-.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup>
 and pass a similar voting bill. S.B. 7 included new restrictions on absentee 
voting; granted broad new autonomy and authority to partisan poll watchers; 
escalated punishments for mistakes or offenses by election officials; and 
banned both drive-through voting and 24-hour voting.
     *   Other 
States:<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/02/us/politics/georgia-voting-law-annotated.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup>
 Arizona’s Republican-controlled Legislature passed a bill that would limit the 
distribution of mail 
ballots<https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/05/11/us/biden-news-today?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-voting-rights&region=MAIN_CONTENT_3&context=storylines-levelup#gov-doug-ducey-of-arizona-signs-a-republican-bill-to-limit-the-distribution-of-mail-ballots>.
 The bill, which includes removing voters from the state’s Permanent Early 
Voting List if they do not cast a ballot at least once every two years, may be 
only the first in a series of voting restrictions to be enacted there. Georgia 
Republicans in March enacted far-reaching new voting laws that limit ballot 
drop-boxes and make the distribution of water within certain boundaries of a 
polling station a misdemeanor. And Iowa has imposed new limits, including 
reducing the period for early voting and in-person voting hours on Election Day.

Mr. Stroebel said Wednesday that the Wisconsin bill containing the requirement 
would not receive a vote. A similar doctor’s note requirement was removed from 
the Texas legislation after lobbying from disability rights advocates.

But disabled voters in Wisconsin said they remained deeply worried by what the 
Senate had passed.

Ms. Jess, who is blind, prefers to vote in person because polling places have 
accessible equipment for visually impaired voters to complete ballots 
independently. But at some point, she said, it might become impossible for her 
to travel safely, in which case she would have to find someone she trusts to 
mark her absentee ballot, and then find a legally acceptable person to return 
it.

She and other voters also expressed concern about a bill that would tighten 
identification requirements for “indefinitely confined” voters, who have 
difficulties traveling.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main 
story<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/14/us/politics/disability-voting-rights.html?campaign_id=56&emc=edit_cn_20210614&instance_id=32992&nl=on-politics-with-lisa-lerer&regi_id=119134593&segment_id=60673&te=1&user_id=519dd6e477b61db01b6c076d7c57e756#after-story-ad-5>

When Wisconsin legislators enacted a photo ID requirement years ago, “they 
maintained this exception for indefinitely confined voters,” said Barbara 
Beckert, Disability Rights Wisconsin’s Milwaukee office director. “There was a 
reason for that, and that reason hasn’t changed.”

Advocates like Ms. Beckert and Kyle Kleist, executive director of the Center 
for Independent Living for Western Wisconsin, said they had worked with State 
Senator Kathy Bernier, a Republican who leads the Senate Elections Committee 
and broke with her party this month when she voted against advancing three 
bills because of their effects on people with disabilities.

Ms. Bernier’s opposition denied the bills a majority on the elections 
committee, but the full Senate approved them anyway. (Only one other 
Republican, Rob Cowles, cast a “no” vote.) They now go to the State Assembly, 
which is also Republican-controlled.

And while some Republicans there have been “receptive to acknowledging what the 
barriers are,” Mr. Kleist said, “still they’re pushing forward full steam 
ahead.”

Texas Republicans are also undeterred; they have vowed to pass their bill over 
all opposition, and Gov. Greg Abbott, who is himself 
disabled<https://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/23/us/candidate-for-texas-governor-draws-support-and-critics-for-talk-of-his-disability.html>,
 is expected to sign it.

“It is discouraging,” said Kenneth Semien, an activist with the Coalition of 
Texans With Disabilities and the American Council of the Blind of Texas. “But I 
know advocacy will continue for the rest of our lives.”

Voting Rights and Accessibility
<https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/25/us/politics/voting-disability-virus.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=Article>
‘A Failed System’: What It’s Like to Vote With a Disability During a Pandemic
Sept. 25, 2020
<https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/26/us/politics/iowa-caucuses-disabilities.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=Article>
Caucusing in Iowa With a Disability: Red Tape and Unreturned Calls
Jan. 26, 2020
Correction: June 15, 2021

An earlier version of this article misstated the given name of a Wisconsin 
state senator. He is Rob Cowles, not Ron Cowles.

Correction: June 16, 2021

An earlier version of this article included outdated descriptions of two bills 
in Wisconsin that had since been amended. The amended proposals would restrict 
who could return voters’ ballots on their behalf and weaken accommodations for 
“indefinitely confined” voters, but would not forbid voters with family 
in-state to have a non-family member return their ballot or require 
indefinitely confined voters to provide photo identification in all cases.

Maggie Astor is a political reporter based in New York. Previously, she was a 
general assignment reporter and a copy editor for The Times and a reporter for 
The Record in New Jersey. @MaggieAstor<https://twitter.com/MaggieAstor>

Other related posts: