Hi George, I know that is the technically correct way to do this. But it creates a lot of clutter for the reader. In this instance, it is a fully bolded paragraph with one word unbolded for emphasis. I don’t see any provision to allow for interchanging the text so that the single word is bolded and the remainder is plain text. Perhaps following print is the only choice for something like this now. Jean From: George Bell Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 3:09 AM To: ueb-ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ueb-ed] Re: Switching font attributes Hi Jean, In the strictest sense, the paragraph would begin with bold passage indicators (assuming 3 or more bold words followed). The bold terminator would appear before the normal word. Then the non-bold word followed by the bold passage indicator. Finally the bold terminator would appear at the end of the remainder of the passage. Alternatively, if you did not wish to use bold indicators for some reason, yet still needed to indicate such “emphasised” words, you could use a “Transcriber Defined Symbol” as described in section 3.26. George. From: ueb-ed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ueb-ed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jean Menzies Sent: 24 October 2014 23:37 To: ueb-ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ueb-ed] Switching font attributes Following UEB and Braille Formats 2011. When an entire note or paragraph is in bold, and there is one word that is NOT bolded for emphasis, how is this now handled? The bold is purely a visual tool, and the emphasized word is the one with “No emphasis”. In the past I would simply ignore the bold and italicize the single word. How is this now handled, and where is it mentioned? I can’t find a specific example of this usage. If a switch is made, how is this indicated on the TN page? Wording? J