[tn-moths] Re: Unidentified/undescribed moths
- From: Hugh McGuinness <hdmcguinness@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:38:53 -0400
The Hodges' numbers only included described species, so Bob Patterson has
put in numerical suffixes for known undesrcibed species.
Hugh
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:22 PM, <klight10@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Are those numbers the year they were numbered? If not, what do they
> signify? I'm still learning too.
>
>
>
> Kris
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "kjchilds" <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "TN Moths" <tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2011 11:11:47 PM
> Subject: [tn-moths] Unidentified/undescribed moths
>
> I hate it when I find something on MPG and then notice the .96/97/98/99 at
> the end of the Hodges number.
>
> http://foco.us/bsGn
>
>
> There's no doubt this is the same moth that's pictured on this page.
>
>
> http://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/species.php?hodges=2229.96
>
>
> Ken Childs
> Henderson, TN
> Chester County
>
> http://www.finishflagfarms.com
>
Other related posts:
