[tn-moths] Re: Not very Wavy-lined Emerald
- From: Hugh McGuinness <hdmcguinness@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:04:55 -0500
Hi All,
By "Thin-lined" do you mean Chlorochlamys phyllinaria? This is certainly
not chlorlchlamys--both antennae and abdominal markings are incorrect. I
would guess that Synchlora aerata is correct, but I have been trying to
prove to myself that this is not a worn Nemoria bifilata, with which the
abdominal markings are a match.
H
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Richard Healy <rdhealy1951@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ken I collected my first last summer no records for KY but it was
> Identified by Moth and Butterfly Identification. I wasn't familiar with
> this moth.
> Rich
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kjchilds <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: tn-moths <tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tue, Jan 10, 2012 3:31 am
> Subject: [tn-moths] Re: Not very Wavy-lined Emerald
>
> Thanks Rich.
>
> I had a fair number of Thin-lined Chlorochlamys Moths this year and it
> doesn't quite match what they looked like so I think I'll have to go with
> Synchlora
> aerata.
>
> Ken
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Richard Healy <rdhealy1951@xxxxxxx>
> *To:* tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* Monday, January 9, 2012 8:24 AM
> *Subject:* [tn-moths] Re: Not very Wavy-lined Emerald
>
> It may be a Thin-lined Chlorochlamys Moth.
> Rich
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kjchilds <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: TN Moths <tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ncsc-moths <
> ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sun, Jan 8, 2012 9:02 am
> Subject: [tn-moths] Not very Wavy-lined Emerald
>
> Is this just a 7058 Synchlora aerata without very wavy lines?
>
> Ken Childs
> Henderson, TN
> Chester County
>
> http://tinyurl.com/FinishFlagFarmsMoths
> http://tinyurl.com/Night-Creatures
> http://www.finishflagfarms.com
>
>
>
>
--
Hugh McGuinness
Sag Harbor, NY
Other related posts:
