[tinwhiskers] Re: New study on coating to mitigate whiskers

  • From: "Fritz, Dennis D." <DENNIS.D.FRITZ@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: <tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:40:46 -0400

What is your whiskers inspection methodology?  
 
I am getting ready to do a study with Purdue undergraduate interns (who work 
for a VERY attractive price for our program).  We will determine both the 
extent of whiskers growth on commercial boards - scrap cell phones and laptops, 
and the ease of measurement by "semi-skilled" operators.  We will be using 
optical microscope, enhanced digital microscope, and simple SEM.  
 
Can you share your proceedures?
 
Denny Fritz
SAIC - Merrillville, IN

________________________________

From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Jim Bunn
Sent: Fri 5/15/2009 10:55 AM
To: tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: New study on coating to mitigate whiskers



I think they are saying it works if the thickness is at least 2mils. Or maybe 
that the coating is better than nothing.

We have a lot of uncoated stuff out there running a test right now. And it's 
pretty comprensive considering the voltage levels that we are using in the 
PCUs. I'm suprised that we have not had some kind of problem.

________________________________

From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Pedro Tort
Sent: Thu 5/14/2009 7:48 AM
To: tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tinwhiskers] New study on coating to mitigate whiskers



The National Physics Laboratory in UK has undertaken a study on the capability 
of different coatings to mitigate tin whiskers growth. The results of this 
investigation reinforces the findings of Jay Bruse and Dr. Henning Leidecker 
who back in 2007 found the Uralane 5750 Polyurethane was an effective 
mitigation strategy for tin whiskers provided the nominal coating thickness was 
2mils.



I quote from the first issue of the NPL Electronics Interconnection Newsletter:



"The use of conformal coatings is seen as the only practical means of 
controlling whisker growths shorting adjacent conductors on a PCB. NPL has 
studied three types of coating, to assess their effectiveness for inhibiting 
whisker growth.

Two coatings, polyurethane and paraxylene both were found to reduce the growth 
of whiskers for up to 150 days of testing, compared with failure of 14 days for 
uncoated samples. The acrylic coating was found not to perform as well as the 
others in parallel tests. All coatings failed to provide sufficient protection 
in areas of insufficient coating coverage, at corners and sides of the test 
samples."





Pedro Tort
Quality Manager

DigiProces, S.A.
Solsones, 87 - P.I. Pla de la Bruguera
P.O. Box 127
E-08211 CASTELLAR DEL VALLES
TEL. +34 937 142 132
FAX. +34 937 142 072
www.digiproces.com






This email and any files contained therein is confidential and may contain 
privileged information.  If you are not the named addressee(s) or you have 
otherwise received this in error, you should not distribute or copy this e-mail 
or use any of its content for any purpose. Please notify the sender immediately 
by e-mail if you have received this e-mail in error and delete it from your 
system



Other related posts: