[THIN] Re: scripting

  • From: "Braebaum, Neil" <Neil.Braebaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:33:35 -0000

...is the wrong answer.

Their MAC addresses - most likely.

But their IP addresses are internal class As - and I suspect that it's
quite feasible that somebody elsewhere in the world is using the same
internal class As somewhere.

Well have to be careful, though - somebody, somewhere will be getting
grumpy about thread-drift and digression.

Neil 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nick Smith
> Sent: 01 December 2005 11:31
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: scripting
> 
> Their IP numbers?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Braebaum, Neil [mailto:Neil.Braebaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 01 December 2005 11:25
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: scripting
> 
> Change user /install on Windows 2000 terminal servers is 
> merely session wide, not server wide.
> 
> And I rather suspect there's nothing unique about my Windows 
> 2000 terminal servers.
> 
> Neil 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeremy Saunders
> > Sent: 01 December 2005 11:24
> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: scripting
> > 
> > No...change user /install on a 2000 server is server wide, 
> unless I'm 
> > missing some hotfix or something. Can be very dangerous 
> depending on 
> > what is going on.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >                                                               
> >              
> >              "Braebaum, Neil"                                 
> >              
> >              <Neil.Braebaum@li                                
> >              
> >              ttlewoods.co.uk>                                 
> >           To 
> >              Sent by:                  <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>   
> >              
> >              thin-bounce@freel                                
> >           cc 
> >              ists.org                                         
> >              
> >                                                               
> >      Subject 
> >                                        [THIN] Re: scripting   
> >              
> >              01/12/2005 05:24                                 
> >              
> >              PM                                               
> >              
> >                                                               
> >              
> >                                                               
> >              
> >              Please respond to                                
> >              
> >                    thin                                       
> >              
> >                                                               
> >              
> >                                                               
> >              
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Comments inline...
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeremy Saunders
> > > Sent: 30 November 2005 20:39
> > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [THIN] Re: scripting
> > >
> > > Yes...true for 2003, but not 2000.
> > 
> > True for both INCLUDING 2000.
> > 
> > > However, regardless of the
> > > OS, the registry (from the shadow key) is not written to the HKCU 
> > > until the next logon, so registry changes will not be
> > updated, unless
> > > the key does not exist in the first place.
> > 
> > No argument.
> > 
> > > If
> > > it does not update existing keys until the next logon, 
> then doesn't 
> > > that have the potential to create a problem if the user tries to 
> > > relaunch the app before logging off and back on again?
> > 
> > Well presumably, they wouldn't know anything about a new 
> app, before a 
> > login cycle - I mean it's possible for folder refresh to 
> include some 
> > newly created shortcuts, but I suspect it's the least of peoples'
> > worries - whether existing sessions can access the changes.
> > 
> > A new app or change in app may require login script changes, or GPO 
> > changes - which may take a while to refresh, anyways.
> > 
> > > I'm not knocking the concept of what's trying to be
> > achieved. I think
> > > you would have to understand more about the individual app first, 
> > > because this process will not work for all. But I like 
> the script :)
> > >
> > >
> > >              "Braebaum, Neil"
> > >
> > >              <Neil.Braebaum@li
> > >
> > >              ttlewoods.co.uk>
> > >           To
> > >              Sent by:                  <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > >              thin-bounce@freel
> > >           cc
> > >              ists.org
> > >
> > >
> > >      Subject
> > >                                        [THIN] Re: scripting
> > >
> > >              30/11/2005 10:28
> > >
> > >              PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >              Please respond to
> > >
> > >                    thin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Install mode isn't server-wide.
> > >
> > > It's just active within the session that's using it.
> > >
> > > Neil
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeremy Saunders
> > > > Sent: 30 November 2005 12:59
> > > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: [THIN] Re: scripting
> > > >
> > > > Very neat, but how do you update the apps whilst people 
> are still 
> > > > logged in using other apps. Is this just used for updating
> > > files, and
> > > > therefore preventing the server from going into install mode?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers.
> > > >
> > > >  Kind regards,
> > > >
> > > >  Jeremy Saunders
> > > >  Senior Technical Specialist
> 
> 
> **************************************************************
> **********
> *****
> This email and its attachments are confidential and are 
> intended for the above named recipient only. If this has come 
> to you in error, please notify the sender immediately and 
> delete this email from your system.
> You must take no action based on this, nor must you copy or 
> disclose it or any part of its contents to any person or 
> organisation. Statements and opinions contained in this email 
> may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods Shop 
> Direct Group Limited or its subsidiaries. Please note that 
> email communications may be monitored. The registered office 
> of Littlewoods Shop Direct Group Limited is 100 Old Hall 
> Street Liverpool L70 1AB registered number 5059352
> **************************************************************
> **********
> *****
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider 
> MailControl - www.blackspider.com
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or 
> Vacation mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> ************************************************
> 
> 
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> ************************************************
> 

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************

Other related posts: