[THIN] Re: UPM
- From: "Hamilton, Ronnie" <ronnie.hamilton@xxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:07:06 -0000
Mark,
You can set the profile path at the server OU under Admin
Templates\System\User Profiles\
Set roaming profile path for all users connecting to this computer
Pick your location this should over write the path set in the AD object.
You could always create an environment variable to hold the value of the
department and populate it with a GPP at logon via item level targeting
by department.
Regards,
Ronnie
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Holley, Mark
Sent: 05 February 2013 15:37
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: UPM
I have been looking over UPM for the XA6.5/windows 2008 upgrade as well.
Right now we "want" to be able to transition from the older V1 profiles
to the newer V2 profiles. However I need to know if there is a way
these 2 profiles can be located on separate servers and separate shares?
To complicate this more we have our Profiles organized into departments
\\servername\profile$\Dept\%username%\Tsprofile
<file:///\\servername\profile$\Dept\%25username%25\Tsprofile> . They
all have the path populated on the AD account as well. Ideally I would
want something like the "group based" folder redirection settings for
this....so far I have not located it.
Any thoughts?
Thank you,
Mark Holley
Systems Architect
Holley@xxxxxxx
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of James Rankin
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 4:47 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: UPM
UPM seems to be fairly popular as a simple, lightweight alternative
where there is a lack of either the budget and/or the skills to deploy
something more specialized such as AppSense. I've had good success with
it, it certainly allows you to cut out some of the problems endemic to
roaming profiles without an exponential increase in environmental
complexity.
I've never personally used it on physical W7 or Vista endpoints, but
anything is better than roaming profiles I would have thought :-)
On 18 January 2013 09:35, Hamilton, Ronnie <ronnie.hamilton@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi,
With a new implementation of XenApp 6.5 I am looking at Citrix UPM and
am wondering how widely used it is ?
When users connect to W7 and Vista physical should the UPM service be
installed also or is it better to just use roaming profiles ?
Thanks
Ronnie
Ronnie Hamilton
Senior Network Engineer
Lufthansa Technik Airmotive Ireland
IT Department
Naas Road, Rathcoole
Co. Dublin, Ireland
Phone: +353 1 401 1253 <tel:%2B353%201%20401%201253>
E-mail: ronnie.hamilton@xxxxxxx <mailto:ronnie.hamilton@xxxxxxx>
www.ltai.ie
Visit our website : www.ltai.ie
__________________________________________
Lufthansa Technik Airmotive Ireland Limited. Registered in Ireland. Reg.
No. 45999. Registered Office: Naas Road, Rathcoole, Co.Dublin.
Lufthansa Technik Airmotive Ireland Leasing Limited. Registered in
Ireland. Reg. No. 140891. Registered Office: Naas Road, Rathcoole,
Co.Dublin.
__________________________________________
The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and
may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
this message, delete any copies held on your systems and notify the
sender by return email. You should not read, retain, copy, disseminate,
distribute, disclose or use this email or its contents in any way. Any
such action is strictly prohibited. Thank you.
--
James Rankin
Technical Consultant (ACA, CCA, MCTS)
http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk
Other related posts:
