[THIN] RE: [THIN] Re: [THIN] RE: [THIN] RE: [THIN] RE: [THIN] Re: VMWare or not ¿?
- From: "Evan Mann" <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:41:18 -0400
Those are dual core Opertons right? Dual proc as well I assume in those boxes?
Are you doing this all 32bit or any 64bit?
That should mean my Dell 1955 blades with 2x dual-core Xeon 3.0ghz processors
should yield me similar results. I'm going to have to give this a try. I
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Schneider, Chad M
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 9:18 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [THIN] Re: [THIN] RE: [THIN] RE: [THIN] RE: [THIN] Re: VMWare or
not ¿?
HP DL385G1 with 16Gb RAM, dual 72Gb 15K Ultra320 SCSI mirrored boot drives; HP
HBA; Additional two Gb NIC ports (4 total); back ended by HP EVA5000 SAN for
LUNS.
All hardware is on the VMware hardware compatibility list.
Running ESX 3.0.1
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Mark Guzzo
Sent: Tue 4/24/2007 11:32 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: [THIN] RE: [THIN] RE: [THIN] RE: [THIN] Re: VMWare or not ¿?
Chad,
Can you please list the hardware you are running VI3 on?
Are you adding any custom settings to the vmx file?
Thanks
On 4/24/07, Schneider, Chad M <CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Multiple Citrix VM's, as well as other non-citrix VM's, per ESX box.
We have several ESX servers, and scatter our VM servers across them.
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Evan Mann
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:04 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] RE: [THIN] RE: [THIN] Re: VMWare or not ¿?
Can you be a little more specific of what you are doing exactly? Such
as:
1) 1 Citrix app server VM on 1 ESX box, no other VMs
2) 1 citrix app server VM on 1 ESX box, with other non Citrix VM's that
are low usage
3) Multiple Citrix app server VMs in a single ESX box
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:56 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] RE: [THIN] Re: VMWare or not ¿?
We have several Citrix servers, PS 4.0 running on VM's (ESX 3.0).
We have used it mainly for things like WI, ZDC, etc., but have several
running applications as well. WE are currently getting 50-60 users per Citrix
VM.
What we have saved is rack space, ability to get several formerly
physical servers, into a single 2U piece of hardware. We are still testing,
but we also have found a slight savings in heat produced, as well as power
used.
I like how quickly I can build out a new VM, based on a template,
versus a full server build. I like the fact that any required reboots are much
faster. I like the fact I can simply P2V from old unsupported hardware, to a
VM.
This is not for everyone, not for every situation, but I do plan to
continue moving more physicals to virtuals in the near future.
Just my $.02.
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of David
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 4:59 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: VMWare or not ¿?
Joe Shonk escribió:
> It depends, why do you want to use VMware with Citrix? What do you
> hope to gain?
>
> Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of David
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:11 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] VMWare or not ¿?
>
> Hi list,
>
> I have been reading and searching information about using Citrix
under
> VMware solution, and I couldn't find a clear solution.
> I have asked to some partners, and one told me that it's a good
> solution, but other told me NOT, (the worst solution to work with
> Citrix due to slow performance).
> So, I would like to know your recommendations about using or not.
> We must upgrade our servers (including the farm), and we're thinking
> about to use VMware for all kind of services, (basically, AD, Oracle,
> CITRIX,...)
>
> Thanks for your support.
> SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com
<http://www.f1u.com/>
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or
Vacation
> mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> ************************************************
> SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com
<http://www.f1u.com/>
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation
> mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> ************************************************
>
>
well, we want to gain better performance (as most of partners saiy),
not only for citrix but all of servers (like print servers, db server, notes
server, etc...) in order to reduce a lot of machine into one, two, or three.
and taking advantadge of it, integrate citrix as well.
SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com <http://www.f1u.com/>
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation
mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com <http://www.f1u.com/>
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation
mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com <http://www.f1u.com/>
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com <http://www.f1u.com/>
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
Other related posts:
