[THIN] Re: RunTogether - start & stop applications as a group.
- From: Andy <andysideas@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:24:57 +0000
That's a great tool Chris.
I am looking for a similar tool that will allow me to restrict the amount of
times an application can load.
In theory a .vbs script would do this, simply by checking to see if a
process was running already or not as that particular user. But my
vbscripting is not all that good yet.
Is this something that you have ever looked at.
Oh forgot to mention, when what the app/script needs to do is change the
focus to the existing instance of the application rather than loading a
second. We use terminal emulation, and find that our users with little
computer knowledge often have about 10 running.
Very important in a Citrix environment.
On 3/11/06, Chris Coleman <chris.coleman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm happy to put something back into the Terminal Server community. I've
> certainly used my fair share of freeware tools over the years in
> implementing server based computing solutions, including the use of
> OpenSource components in RunTogether (it would have been much much harder to
> write it without them).
>
> BTW, I've just updated RunTogether to V1.1-01, to fix a bug that
> prevented space characters from being manually entered in the command line
> for an application. I'll be adding new features and functionality as I get
> time in the next few weeks / months. The latest version will always be
> available from http://sourceforge.net/projects/runtogether
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Michel Roth
> *Posted At:* Fri 10/03/2006 10:09 PM
> *Posted To:* Thin
> *Conversation:* [THIN] Re: RunTogether - start & stop applications as a
> group.
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: RunTogether - start & stop applications as a group.
>
>
> Nice gesture in sharing your work Chris!
>
> http://www.thincomputing.net/newsitem1674.html
>
> On 3/9/06, Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data <bcoffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for this - I don't have an immediate need but I'd be far from
> > surprised if I needed this at some point...
> >
> > - Bob Coffman
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Other related posts:
