[THIN] Re: RAID 1
- From: Nick Smith <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:51:15 +0100
Indeed, but...does this translate to less sessions/server in the real world?
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Jez
Sent: 02 May 2007 15:26
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: RAID 1
On 5/2/07, Nick Smith <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorta connected, we had a discussion a while back about
> SAS vs SATA drives in a TS setup. There were some strong
> feeling that SATA were junk,
Sort of...
SATA has slower drive speeds, less manageability, 1/2 the transfer
rate, and a higher MTBF than SAS. As it's lower cost, you also tend to
find SATA in entry level servers that have less performance features.
SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
This e-mail is confidential and is intended only for the attention of the
addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, this e-mail should not be disclosed to
any other person.
Please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail from your computer
system.
Although this e-mail has been checked for viruses and other defects,
no responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage arising from its
receipt or use.
SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
Other related posts:
