[THIN] Re: Processing the autoexec.bat???

  • From: "Lilley, Brian" <brian.lilley@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:15:11 +0100

I remember when NT3.1 came out, there was some reg keys documented that
provided a per user execution of autoexec.bat?? I wonder if it is searching
dir structures for it?   I think autoexec is still relevant in some cases
because of the point in the whole logon procedure that it gets executed.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Ron Oglesby
Sent: 10 September 2004 03:33
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Processing the autoexec.bat???



OK. Interesting one. I had one customer that had this showing up when running
a userEnv debug (for logon) and now I have run into another place that has. It
seems Windows 2003 specific, but if you turn on the userEnvDebug level to
verbose (10002) you see in the log a 11-12 second gap where it says "unable to
process autoexec.bat" , I mean WTF, what is this DOS ?

 

Anyway, anyone else seen this. Seems to happen most often AFTER the local copy
of the profile has been deleted and a new local def user profile is needed.
But the log shows it is copied and all and its not that. I mean how can a 400K
profile take 11 seconds to copy..

 

Thoughts?

 

Ron Oglesby

Senior Technical Architect

Microsoft MVP, Windows Server 

 

RapidApp, Chicago

Office 312.372.7188

Mobile 815.325.7618

email roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 

 

 


==============================================================================
This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received
this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was
misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB
retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its network.
Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB until they
are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be secure.
==============================================================================

Other related posts: