[THIN] Re: Opinion requested
- From: "Steve Snyder" <kwajalein@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 08:28:51 +1200
The only time I've seen it make a noticable difference was accessing a
published app (Solomon) over a slow WAN - that was with MFXP. didn't
troubleshoot it to determine why it made a difference, just set it to 40 and
moved on.
On 6/9/07, Jensen, Jay <jjensen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On our ICA client we have always used 128-bit encryption. My new boss
feels we do not need 128-bit encryption any longer due to performance gains
it will provide us. I have protested that I feel we should never understate
security and we should keep our ICA client packets set to use 128-bit
encryption.
Am I wrong to desire us to leave our ICA client packet set to 128-bit
encryption? Do we really gain a lot of performance gains by using the
Citrix Encryption default setting instead?
I value this list opinions so I am asking for your feedback!
Thank You.
Other related posts:
