[THIN] Re: OT: Anyone have a preference for non-Xerox copier solutions?
- From: "Bray, Donovan (ESC)" <BrayD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:13:02 -0700
We have a flock of Imagerunner 550's and 210's. They are fine and capable
copiers but they are disastrous network printers.
Over the 5 year lease we have fought numerous driver issues, compatability
with our Terminal Servers, and Macintosh printing. We are finally replacing
these units and they most definately will not be replaced with more Canons.
I also found Netspot to be a dismal network management tool for a large
number of printers.
_____
From: Greg Reese [mailto:gareese@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 4:37 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: Anyone have a preference for non-Xerox copier
solutions?
Canon ImageRunners. We used them at my last job and they were great! Rumor
has it there are some at the warehouse from JI.
Greg
On 9/7/05, Steve Snyder <kwajalein@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:kwajalein@xxxxxxxxx> >
wrote:
Sorry for the off topic post, I'm just in the habit of asking general
knowledge questions of people with a lot of general knowledge.
Anyway, we're evaluating whether or not to stay with the extremely expensive
Xerox solution for our photo copier needs, and am wondering if anyone has
any good or bad experiences with non-Xerox equipment that they'd care to
share. We run the gamut from little desktop models, to a somewhat mammothly
large 130ppm machine.
TIA
Other related posts:
