Out of curiousity, when using ThinPrint why were you doing the ThinPrint printers and the autocreated PS printers? why not go with one way and not confuse the user?
As well, I believe both ThinPrint and Tricerat clients can be combined with the ICA client installs so you only have one install that needs to be pushed down to the clients.
Jeff Pitsch Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
Forums not enough? Get support from the experts at your business http://jeffpitschconsulting.com
First off, our printing is cut and dry/simple…all windows clients are standard, clean desktops with a completely locked down version of Win XP. Nothing installed locally. Users come into a published desktop that is hosted in the datacenter via web interface. Printers are auto-created during login/based on what you have installed (either locally attached or networked/shared printers) on the local client. We don't save printers in the user's profile/published desktop.
Thinprint – cost was substantial. Not a cheap solution. This is a very flexible product and great if you have some funky clients/difficult printing requirements. We don't. There are a number of ways you can deploy it for either clientless setup, having local thinprint server, etc, etc. Like I said, lots of flexibility but each of the options had downsides and if we're going to pay the high price we want everything fixed/better – not a mostly lateral move.
You need to install a client on local clients – there are some configs where you don't have to do this, but again, tradeoffs. Since we do auto-creation, users were getting two sets of printers – Citrix and Thinprint…i.e. confusion for clients. You also had to manipulate the local client (icon in the system tray) to get it just the way you wanted. Again, great flexibility but confusing for our users/didn't work all the time. The fact that it didn't work all the time put us in the same boat as Citrix's UPD…and we were paying quite a bit more. We also didn't like the way you had to manage the thinprint ports – we saw a lot of manual work for each one of our Citrix servers…this product would have essentially caused us to have to "silo" users to specific servers based on printing needs…this goes against our core thinking/scalability model of keeping things simple/dynamic.
As for Tricerat – we had some test servers bluescreen as a result of using their solution. That was a pretty massive flag but we continued testing. In a nutshell the driverless printing was nice but you also had to install a client on every local machine and that meant additional support overhead/complicating the environment. We work in a WAN environment with no permanent connections to the workstations; we can't use deployment tools so this is problematic. As compared to the UPD, the UPD works…kinda, but Tricert was working – kinda, as well so again, we're not making much progress in moving towards lowering costs/adding functionality/increasing stability. Oh yes, and there is an extra cost involved...
Believe me – if we could find a product that fixed all of our printing issues (or at least 90%) of them – we would buy it in a heartbeat as printing is the #1 headache with our model. I just don't think the product exists…therefore – we ride the UPD.
If anyone knows better – please enlighten me!
Chris
------------------------------
*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Landin, Mark *Sent:* Friday, July 28, 2006 1:01 PM
*To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Moer and more....logon scripts hanging....
Interesting. What problems did you see yourself introducing with a ThinPrint or a Simplify? Just curious.
------------------------------
*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Chris Grecsek *Sent:* Friday, July 28, 2006 2:46 PM *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Moer and more....logon scripts hanging....
Make sure you have the latest hotfixes…there are a few new ones that are directly related to the cpsvc.exe service (the one that bonks). The biggest thing we did to stabilize our environment was to force all printing to be done via the UPD (talking about 4.0 of course).
We looked at 3rd party printing solutions but when we did the full assessment we determined that we'd be solving some problems but really trading those for a new set of problems…and paying more money for those problems/confusing our clients. At the end of the day we just decided that the proper course was to ride the 4.0 UPD and hope that Citrix continues to stabilize/improve it.
------------------------------
*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Schneider, Chad M *Sent:* Friday, July 28, 2006 11:39 AM *To:* 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' *Subject:* [THIN] Moer and more....logon scripts hanging....
Having to restart the spooler…which does not always work successfully, which then requires a reboot.
Chad Schneider
Technology Analyst/Citrix Admin.
Bemis Company, Inc.
920-303-7609