[THIN] Re: Lognhorn
- From: "Beckett, William \(Bill\)" <bill.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:27:57 -0400
Would you say that for a LAN environment as opposed to a WAN configuration as
well?
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Jeff Pitsch
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 11:12 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Lognhorn
There are enhancements but they won't make you say HEY, I can move away from
Citrix now.
Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
Provision Networks VIP
Forums not enough?
Get support from the experts at your business
On 10/24/06, Beckett, William (Bill) <bill.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Still I do see quite a bit of enhancement at first glance
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Cláudio Rodrigues
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:53 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Lognhorn
Many things on it are a needed improvement (seamless windows, RDP over
SSL, etc).
But I still think the way things got implemented, for most small/medium
businesses, it is overkill. Way too complicated for the average admin in some
scenarios and considering the fact I was in charge of Terminal-Services.NET
when we designed our own gateway, seamless windows, etc, I can guarantee you
things could have been done much better and simpler.
But well, it is a step in the right direction.
And if they do all perfectly, there would be no need for companies like
mine. :-)
Cláudio Rodrigues
Microsoft MVP
Windows Server - Terminal Services
http://www.tsfactory.ca <http://www.tsfactory.ca/>
________________________________
From: "Beckett, William (Bill)" <bill.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:22:24 -0400
To: < thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
Conversation: Lognhorn
Subject: [THIN] Lognhorn
Anyone had a chance to play around with Terminal Services in Longhorn
Beta 2? If so, what were your thoughts?
Other related posts:
