[THIN] Re: Cannot connect to 4.5 server externally

  • From: Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:24:21 -0400

any errors in the event logs?

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Peterson David <DPETERSO@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

>  Altaddr is set, I also completely disabled the client firewall to make
> sure that wasn't causing an issue. I can connect to my 4.0 servers fine from
> the outside via the quick launch. Client version is 11.0.0.5357.
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Jeff Pitsch
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 28, 2009 10:28 AM
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Cannot connect to 4.5 server externally
>
>   is your NAT setup properly and your altaddr on the citrix box?  In
> program neighbhorhood did you configure your firewall button correctly?
>
> Jeff Pitsch
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Peterson David <DPETERSO@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>>  We have a new 4.5 server in it's own farm, on server 2003. I can connect
>> internally using a custom ICA connection or quick launch but cannot connect
>> from the Internet (we don't have WI for this system installed yet.)
>>
>> When I try to connect via Quick launch over the Internet I get a protocol
>> driver error, from a custom ica connection I get XenApp server not
>> available. Telnetting to port 1494 (get ICA) and 2598 work, as does
>> connecting via rdp.
>>
>> From inside the network I can connect via ICA fine, but only using the
>> internal name. On our 4.0 servers, I can connect using either.
>>
>> Anyone have any suggestions?
>>
>>
>> *NOTICE*: This electronic mail transmission from the law firm of Dinsmore
>> & Shohl may constitute an attorney-client communication that is privileged
>> at law. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any
>> unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission
>> in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify
>> the sender by reply e-mail, so that our address record can be corrected.
>>
>
>

Other related posts: