This is a frustrating one as a search on Google shows lot's have had to deal with this issue at one time or another. Environment: Windows 2003 X64 Standard Edition Xen5 All systems provisioned Starting yesterday morning (Monday) we have been battling high CPU usage on a few of our published desktops. When you dig in you can see that various users have taken a full cpu with AcroRd32.exe. We are running 10.1.3. Supposedly the only thing that has changed was a single in house .Net application getting a new exe. The developers are in the same building so they have been part of the troubleshooting process as well. We even rolled back to a prior image and can still reproduce the problem. It has not been easy to get support from Adobe on a free product but we continue to try that road as well as some others. Only these 2-3 desktops are having the issue while 50+ others seem to be just fine. One thing that we tried that looked to address the issue was renaming/deleting a file in %APPDAT%\Adobe\Acrobat\10.0 directory called ReaderMessages. That seemed to take care of it in our testing so last night we scripted the deletion of that file via login script. This morning we continue to fight high cpu issues and have people in front of the consoles manually deleting Acrobat Reader process. We were even able to reproduce this by just opening Reader X and closing it. The app is closed to the user but the process continues to run. Personally I don't have this issue but if I grab a copy of the ReaderMessages file and add it to my own %APPDATA% path I can then reproduce the problem. This file is getting recreated from somewhere but we can't find it yet. We've check anti virus, GPOs, OS patches, etc and have not come up with anything. The only other thing that happened over the weekend was an extra.dat from McAfee was implemented due to some crazy printer virus that was discovered last Friday night. We worked with McAfee and they provided an extra.dat to address that issue. I would think that if the extra.dat was the issue we would see this problem much more wide spread, but it is only contained to a few desktops. Has anyone else ever battled something like this? Same version or Reader is deployed across the org and this week is the first we have seen anything. Thanks in advance for any help. -- Michael Pardee http://blindsquirrel.org