WE have the other groups in CAG. They work fine. The trouble is the default group, it is active, and for those not in my created group, citrixag, they can still authenticate and make a connection. Heck, I have logons on the shop floor, that could go home and make this connection and launch their applications from home. I only want group citrixag to be able to connect to this... _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 8:38 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.2 If your using the default group then your getting exaclty what you setup. Implement another group in the CAG. I tested this out last night and it works just fine. Your implement is flawed if your doing this through the default group. Jeff Pitsch Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server Forums not enough? Get support from the experts at your business http://jeffpitschconsulting.com <http://jeffpitschconsulting.com/> On 8/3/06, Schneider, Chad M <CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: Ok...I can require authentication to the portal page...but any user in the AD, so long as they can authenticate, can log onto this Gateway. This is the issue, I only want users in particular AD groups, which I have created as local groups on the gateway, to be able to sign onto the gateway. It should not be this hard to only allow domain group A to connect to this unit. _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Steve Greenberg Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:47 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.2 You can set require authentication to the portal page, this will force them to login at the very first stage before getting any options. Be sure to remove any resources from default group, do not set the default group portal properties to go to WI, and, do not check "inherit default group properties" for the other groups. That should do it. I think you must have set WI as the default portal redirect and since you did not require authentication to get to this default page, everyone got it!! Steve Greenberg Thin Client Computing 34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453 Scottsdale, AZ 85262 (602) 432-8649 www.thinclient.net <http://www.thinclient.net/> steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 10:01 PM To: ' thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.2 I have the default group, and 2 other groups, each having around 15 users in the corresponding AD domain group. The users I have tested are not in either of the created local, nor AD domain groups. They appear to be connecting using the default user group, as I set that to change things like the the Gateway portal settings, and that account uses the default settings. What I want is for no one to use default group, only allow connection to ANYTHING, even sign onto my gateway, if they are listed in a group I create and grant rights to. _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Steve Greenberg Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 11:52 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.2 This is confusing to me too. The behavior of either a VPN connection or WI redirect are both triggered by groups. If you are using CAG without AAC all you need to do is setup the LDAP authorization and authentication and then create a local CAG group with the same name as the target AD group. Obviously if the group is something like Domain Users, everyone will get in. I would suggest a simple test- create a new group in AD and create the same group name on the CAG. Point it to some web link or resource, only but one account in the group. I suspect that it will work as you want and that there may be some other issue related to group membership going on here.... Steve Greenberg Thin Client Computing 34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453 Scottsdale, AZ 85262 (602) 432-8649 www.thinclient.net <http://www.thinclient.net/> steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 3:25 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.2 so to put this in perspective, everything works if you don't go to WI. say you allow vpn access to thsoe users, then the appropriate groups are enforced. if you go straight to WI though then everyone gets through? Or is that groups are not enforced at all? Jeff Pitsch Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server Forums not enough? Get support from the experts at your business http://jeffpitschconsulting.com <http://jeffpitschconsulting.com/> On 8/2/06, Evan Mann < <mailto:emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Sounds like you are asking for the same thing I asked about a while ago. I have my CAG going straight to WI using SSO. (Hit CAG in browser, put in username/password, click OK and you are dropped into WI and you see your apps.) Qw don't use the VPN features of the CAG at all. The only thing I ever came up with was to direct requests to an IIS server first and use NTFS security based on group membership to determine if the basic auth to the IIS server would allow them to then redirect to the CAG. A few issues can be caused by this (SSL and DNS in particular) depending on the network location of the IIS server, CAG, and inside/outside access needs. I never looked to see if this kind of functionality is available via AAC, but this is such a simple request/option, I couldn't understand why it's not available. Alternatively, you could just do this security on the WI server. I suppose it's not as secure, because users you don't want through the CAG in the first place get through, but at least you could block them from loading the WI page unless they were in a particular NTFS group. _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto: <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 5:03 PM To: ' thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.2 Sorry to be dense on this...just got HAMMERED down our windpipe... _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 3:59 PM To: ' thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.2 We go to the CAG, it asks for credentials, we then go to our Web interface URL rather than the default gateway portal.... Once in the WI, they click on their applications and launch a VPN connected Citrix app. I must be missing something. _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 3:43 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.2 Oh so we aren't talking about the VPN connection. If you are going direct to WI and not authenticating to the CAG before hand then this would be as expected. Jeff Pitsch Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server Forums not enough? Get support from the experts at your business http://jeffpitschconsulting.com <http://jeffpitschconsulting.com/> On 8/2/06, Schneider, Chad M < CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: I created 2 groups, in the CAG. Each is working fine, however, ALL users in the AD domain are able to get through it and into it as well. We have it set to go directly to our Web Interface page... _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 3:12 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.2 Is this simply the CAG? You can setup groups in the CAG that would allow you to define who has access. Jeff Pitsch Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server Forums not enough? Get support from the experts at your business http://jeffpitschconsulting.com <http://jeffpitschconsulting.com/> On 8/2/06, Schneider, Chad M < CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: I have it configured for LDAP, working great...well...sort of... I want it to only allow the users/groups I grant rights to, the ability to use this...not the ENTIRE LDAP directory... Can anyone assist? Chad Schneider Technology Analyst/Citrix Admin. Bemis Company, Inc. 920-303-7609