Brush, "Photos or it didn't happen" is a common tongue in cheek saying. As for those Razorbill, Pigeon and Black Swift... there is a reason why they are on the "presumptive list". Cameron Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 19, 2014, at 14:01, Brush Freeman <brushfreeman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > "Photos or it didn't happen" Geez Cameron that is profound. Hey I am right > there with you. Maybe we can convince the TBRC to throw out the huge bulk of > well written and accepted documentation that have no associated photos with > the record, no matter the observer's expertise.....Let's try!. That would > include such silly things like "murre Species, Razorbill, White-crowned > Pigeon, Black Swift and Crescent-chested Warbler. I realize that you will no > longer be reporting species you could not photograph and meanwhile I am > voiding my notebook of birds that "did not happen" this morning. I don't > even like taking bird photos so I will just continue to imagine those Blue > Jays and Chickadees. > > ********************************************************************** > Brush Freeman > 503-551-5150 Cell > 120 N. Red Bud Trail. Elgin, Tx. 78621 > http://texasnaturenotes.blogspot.com/ > Finca Alacranes., Utley,Texas > > >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Cameron Carver <c.o.carver@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> Written field reports and sketches are certainly great ways to learn. >> Studying the bird in front of you and writing/sketching the details is a >> great way to learn a species' nuances. BUT here is the problem: Let's say >> that the view of the bird was fleeting or that you didn't write/sketch >> details until after the bird left (both of these scenarios are extremely >> common in birding). Your brain likes to fill in blanks. And in order to fill >> in the blanks it uses what you know, think you know or what you expect. In >> doing so your brain may (and will) fudge the details to help you better >> explain the story or observation. >> >> Take for example "The war of the ghosts" (Bartlett 1932) where participants >> were told a story and then expected to recount the story. The participants >> added their own details to the story and eliminated some elements that >> seemed implausible. With repeat tellings the story deviated further from the >> original. >> >> This sort of "filling in" extends to any and all aspects of human >> observation. So, written/sketched reports made at any point after the >> observation are inherently flawed. >> >> Heidi's sketch of the original Harris's Sparrow was made after the >> observation. While she may not know it, her mind had plenty of time to >> process what she was seeing. It was already comparing the bird to other HASP >> she has seen and the one she saw previously at the location a year before. >> That sort of thinking could have easily influenced her sketch and likely did. >> >> This doesn't even address the fact that human observation can be influenced >> by stress and emotion. >> >> Written/sketch reports are certainly a necessary tool in birding, but they >> are not "hard" evidence. Nothing beats photo, video, audio or a specimen. >> This sort of "hard" evidence should be encouraged over any sort of "soft" >> evidence. As I stated in a previous post, 61% of US adults own a smart >> phone. Your smart phone can not only take geotagged photos, but record video >> and audio. Not to mention that inexpensive, mega-zoom point-and-shoot >> digital cameras are numerous.There is a reason why reliance on >> photodocumentation has become the standard. >> >> The art of writing a report is certainly lost. Written reports add a sense >> of feeling and place and are nice for historical accounts, but writing is >> certainly not a necessity. It only supports an observation, it does not >> confirm it. And if you have enough time to sketch a bird with it in front of >> you, then you certainly had enough time to get a photo. >> >> "Photos or it didn't happen" >> >> Cameron Carver >> Lubbock, TX >> >> Sent from my iPhoneEdit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at >> //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds >> >> Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission >> from the List Owner > Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission from the List Owner