[texbirds] Re: Written and sketched reports and Reconstructive Memory

  • From: Cameron Carver <c.o.carver@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Brush Freeman <brushfreeman@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:27:22 -0500

Brush,
"Photos or it didn't happen" is a common tongue in cheek saying.

As for those Razorbill, Pigeon and Black Swift... there is a reason why they 
are on the "presumptive list".

Cameron 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 19, 2014, at 14:01, Brush Freeman <brushfreeman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> "Photos or it didn't happen"  Geez Cameron that is profound.   Hey I am right 
> there with you.  Maybe we can convince the TBRC to throw out the huge bulk of 
> well written and accepted documentation that have no associated photos with 
> the record, no matter the observer's expertise.....Let's try!.   That would 
> include such silly things like  "murre Species, Razorbill, White-crowned 
> Pigeon, Black Swift and Crescent-chested Warbler.  I realize that you will no 
> longer be reporting species you could not photograph and meanwhile I am 
> voiding my notebook of birds that "did not happen" this morning.  I don't 
> even like taking bird photos so I will just continue to imagine those Blue 
> Jays and Chickadees.
> 
> **********************************************************************
> Brush Freeman
> 503-551-5150 Cell
> 120 N. Red Bud Trail. Elgin, Tx. 78621
> http://texasnaturenotes.blogspot.com/
> Finca Alacranes., Utley,Texas
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Cameron Carver <c.o.carver@xxxxxxxxx> 
>> wrote:
>> Written field reports and sketches are certainly great ways to learn. 
>> Studying the bird in front of you and writing/sketching the details is a 
>> great way to learn a species' nuances. BUT here is the problem: Let's say 
>> that the view of the bird was fleeting or that you didn't write/sketch 
>> details until after the bird left (both of these scenarios are extremely 
>> common in birding). Your brain likes to fill in blanks. And in order to fill 
>> in the blanks it uses what you know, think you know or what you expect. In 
>> doing so your brain may (and will) fudge the details to help you better 
>> explain the story or observation.
>> 
>> Take for example "The war of the ghosts" (Bartlett 1932) where participants 
>> were told a story and then expected to recount the story. The participants 
>> added their own details to the story and eliminated some elements that 
>> seemed implausible. With repeat tellings the story deviated further from the 
>> original.
>> 
>> This sort of "filling in" extends to any and all aspects of human 
>> observation. So, written/sketched reports made at any point after the 
>> observation are inherently flawed.
>> 
>> Heidi's sketch of the original Harris's Sparrow was made after the 
>> observation. While she may not know it, her mind had plenty of time to 
>> process what she was seeing. It was already comparing the bird to other HASP 
>> she has seen and the one she saw previously at the location a year before. 
>> That sort of thinking could have easily influenced her sketch and likely did.
>> 
>> This doesn't even address the fact that human observation can be influenced 
>> by stress and emotion.
>> 
>> Written/sketch reports are certainly a necessary tool in birding, but they 
>> are not "hard" evidence. Nothing beats photo, video, audio or a specimen. 
>> This sort of "hard" evidence should be encouraged over any sort of "soft" 
>> evidence. As I stated in a previous post, 61% of US adults own a smart 
>> phone. Your smart phone can not only take geotagged photos, but record video 
>> and audio. Not to mention that inexpensive, mega-zoom point-and-shoot 
>> digital cameras are numerous.There is a reason why reliance on 
>> photodocumentation has become the standard.
>> 
>> The art of writing a report is certainly lost. Written reports add a sense 
>> of feeling and place and are nice for historical accounts, but writing is 
>> certainly not a necessity. It only supports an observation, it does not 
>> confirm it. And if you have enough time to sketch a bird with it in front of 
>> you, then you certainly had enough time to get a photo.
>> 
>> "Photos or it didn't happen"
>> 
>> Cameron Carver
>> Lubbock, TX
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhoneEdit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at
>> //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds
>> 
>> Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission
>> from the List Owner
> 

Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at 
//www.freelists.org/list/texbirds

Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission 
from the List Owner


Other related posts: