[texbirds] More on names, lists etc. (longish again).

  • From: Stephen Gast <segast23@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "brushfreeman@xxxxxxxxx" <brushfreeman@xxxxxxxxx>, steve mayes <sgmayes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:40:51 -0700 (PDT)

OK, so my last statement on my previous email said I hadn't looked at the 
statistics of differences in the lists. 
 
Well..........I wasted the last 6 hours or so looking in detail at them. Note - 
all of these numbers are plus or minus one or two - I just did this to get an 
idea of how much difference there is and not to really get a perfect number, 
however I might have gotten lucky and gotten some of them exact. Here goes.
 
Clements world list stands at about 10,239. The IOC list stands at about 10,640 
(it changes rapidly and I am not sure I had the latest)
So the IOC has about 401 species more than Clements, however Clements has 38 
species that IOC does not recognize, plus 9 that IOC does not include because 
they are presumed extinct. So IOC actually has 448 species that Clements does 
not have. 
 
So what about the AOU? As Jack Eitniear pointed out, that is the list that 
counts for many since that is the basis for the ABA list. Well I made one 
assumption that may not be perfectly correct, but it is maybe close.  I assumed 
that Clements and AOU were in more or less perfect agreement. So I could have 
missed a few things in the unusual situation where IOC and AOU agreed, but 
Clements was independent of both. But also with respect to the exact 
differences between AOU and IOC -  same caveat - a close but not perfect 
accounting. And if someone wants to compare Clements directly with AOU - let me 
know your results. I am done for the time being. I have to be productive 
tomorrow. So here goes again -
 
The AOU has a published list with 2090 species for the North American AOU 
region, which includes Bermuda, the Caribbean, Central America and Hawaii. Of 
these:
54 would be impacted by name changes due to splits per the IOC list resulting 
in the addition of roughly 42 adds to the AOU list, with the remainder being 
species on other continents which have precedence over the name if split and 
which have not occurred in the AOU region (I did not research this aspect 
completely and there is likely errors here - but you get the idea). In the 
negative column, 2 species are not on IOC's list that are on AOU's, one lump (a 
trogon), and one presumed extinct (in Hawaii).
 
Now,  as to name changes without affecting numbers of species, which was what 
started all this off ( well actually it was capital letters but.....),  
According to IOC 15 taxa on the AOU list should have different Genus names 
assigned, and 4 have errors in species name endings - that is, a 'us' should be 
changed to an 'a' or vice versa at the end of the word to be grammatically 
correct in Latin. 
 
In the English name category it gets pretty strange. The IOC folks have a 
decided aversion to hyphens and to spelling the color 'gray' with an 'a'. And 
so 160 English names have been changed only to eliminate hyphens and to change 
'gray' to 'grey'. I guess this is really throwing a bone to the British, who 
started naming all the birds around the world before we were a country over 
here. I kind of agree with the hyphen thing though. 
 
And finally, 76 names are proposed for English name changes. Some simply adding 
the name American or Northern or Mexican (for example there are Grey and Dusky 
Flycatchers and a Yellow Warbler in Africa as well), some to agree with the 
name of the same species elsewhere (such as Great Grey Shrike instead of 
Northern Shrike - Brits named this one first too) and changing  some English 
names to better coincide with some Genus names (e.g. all the Amazona parrots go 
from 'Parrots' to 'Amazons', some Nightjars to Poorwills, and some Hummingbirds 
to Mountaingems). A few name changes seem rather arbitrary, but I am sure 
somebody has some reason somewhere. 
 
So in summary - the AOU list as measured by the (more aggressive?/liberal?) IOC 
list could be increased by about 2% if all splits went through. About 3.5% of 
the AOU English names could be changed yet, while the Genus and species names 
(excluding splits) are pretty settled down with only about .075% in play at 
present. By comparison the world list has about 4.25% of species in play and a 
lot higher percentage of name changes in play as well. 
 
Early this year I have also did a comparison chart of different treatments of 
Family orders in the various world lists (when Parrots and Falcons went 
together after Woodpeckers). I can share that off-line with anyone that might 
be interested. But you can also find a treatment of this in the last volume of 
Handbook of Birds of the World which just came out. 
 
(Maybe I should have just put this out to the Ornithology listserv - apologies 
to those who aren't interested.)  
Steve Gast
Houston, Texas
segast23@xxxxxxxxx
Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at 
//www.freelists.org/list/texbirds

Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission 
from the List Owner


Other related posts: