[TCUG] Re: Inclusive mobility
- From: Damien Meehan <DMeehan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 09:23:44 -0000
Just to widen the debate further, should fault contact details be included
as a small text box in such strips? I've noticed them in Notts and they
appear to make perfect sense and when combined with the pbu band, I think it
makes even more sense.
What does everyone else think?
Damian Meehan
Senior Engineer
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Smith [mailto:MASmith@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 23 January 2003 08:47
To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [TCUG] Inclusive mobility
Dear All,
Further to my earlier message a trawl through the new TSRGD 2002 regs
reveals in Direction 46, para 7 (a) that the post may be marked with a
yellow or white band not less than 140 nor more than 160mm deep, the lower
edge of the band being not less than 1500 nor more than 1700mm above ground
level.
To counter some forms of vandalism I am aware that self adhesive materials
are available that are classed as "anti-pick", therefore very small bits
will only come away when attacked rather than the whole band.
Matthew Smith
Assistant Engineer
Transport Programmes & Improvements
Tel. 0116 265 7361
Fax. 0116 265 7340
_______________________________________________________________________
The contents of this message do not necessarily represent the
opinions, views, policy or procedures of Leicestershire County Council.
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
_______________________________________________________________________
The contents of this message do not necessarily represent the
opinions, views, policy or procedures of Leicestershire County Council.
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
Other related posts:
