[TCUG] Re: FW: TCUG query

  • From: mervyn.hallworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:25:22 +0100

I may be missing something here, but surely you just need a new 
('permanent-type') controller equipped with elv outputs (Microsense and 
Peek both do this as I understand it), which will come with all 
functionality including UTC interface (as specified).  If you install this 
on a short term basis - surely it becomes 'temporary'!
Mervyn
Leeds 0113 2476750





"Pat Gregory" <patrick.gregory2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
31/07/2007 09:28
Please respond to
tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
<tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
[TCUG] Re: FW: TCUG query






This subject has been bouncing around for years!!

I would imagine that the first requirement is to look at the legal
requirements for temporary signals (conflicts, detection etc.) and then
apply them to the semi permanent arrangement, hopefully any permanent
controller post 0141 would supercede these requirements! I would imagine 
it
would be pretty easy to get a "bombproof" controller (T200, 400) which is
easy to build up or down to the required configuration. (other controllers
are available) If there is a requirement for 50-0-50 supply, then I 
believe
most controllers were available to Welsh Office Spec or possibly Hong Kong
which had this as a requirement. I've never understood why temps could not
be controlled under UTC as long as the controller and interface were
approved for use, which in this case, they would be. I would look no 
further
than TfLs stockpile of controllers and build various configurations to 
suit,
based on the existing MOC.

regards

-----Original Message-----
From: tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf
Of Morar Jag (ST)
Sent: 30 July 2007 13:26
To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [TCUG] FW: TCUG query


Alan.

Thank you for your response.

As I understand it, portables have limited capability and features. What 
we
are attempting to do is develop a temporary/portable controller that can
provide the full range of phases/stages and detection as the existing site
controller that may have been knocked down or is being replaced under
modernisation.

The key issue is that we want to maintain the network capacity through the
period that the work is taking place.

Best regards,

Jag
-----Original Message-----
From: Allan Lonsdale [mailto:allan.lonsdale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]=20
Sent: 30 July 2007 11:32
To: Morar Jag (ST)
Subject: TCUG query


Jag - in Blackpool we use portable signals for such situations - these are
provided and managed by a local traffic management company.

In the event of a knock-down we can usually have portable signal control
within 1 hour - if its a large junction then we reduce the traffic lanes
with signing and coning - obviously this causes delays but at least the
junction is safely controlled.

We also successfully used portables at various stages of junction
modernisation / improvements.

With the advent of the new radio controlled portables there is no longer 
the
need for extensive cabling and cable mats

Regards

Allan Lonsdale
Engineer - Traffic Signals
Blackpool Council=20


Email Disclaimer is:=20
http://www.blackpool.gov.uk/EmailDisclaimer/
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft 
Exchange
as part of the Council's e-mail and internet policy.


***************************************************************************=
********
The contents of the e-mail and any transmitted files are confidential and 
i=
ntended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
add=
ressed. Transport for London hereby exclude any warranty and any liability 
=
as to the quality or accuracy of the contents of this email and any 
attache=
d transmitted files. If you are not the intended recipient be advised that 
=
you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, 
forw=
arding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this email in error please notify 
postmaster@xxxxxxxxx=
k.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the 
=
presence of computer viruses.
***************************************************************************=
********
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list visit
//www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug


-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug



________________________________________________________________________

The information in this email (and any attachment) may be for the
intended recipient only. If you know you are not the intended recipient,
please do not use or disclose the information in any way and please
delete this email (and any attachment) from your system. 

The Council does not accept service of legal documents by e-mail.        
________________________________________________________________________



-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug

Other related posts: