I like the lanyard Idea Jack Sent from my Mil Spec IPhone 4S On Feb 8, 2012, at 4:31 PM, gary-walker@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > My 2 cents as well... > > > > It appears that there are 2 main points of interest in the rules > revisions...so far. > > > > 1. Motor ignition methods - As Jack and others have said, pretty cut and dry > as I understand it. That said, yes, it appears that some existing > electronics that require break/pull wires may need to be phased out. > > > > 2. Non-HPR (i.e. uninsured persons) on the range/launch area. - Perhaps we > could have all HPR fliers openly display their membership cards (TRA or NAR) > at all times on a lanyard or clipped to their short/jacket. Also, we might > designate a Pad Manager or additional RSO's, as we've had at times in the > past, to oversee the actual pad area. This would help clarify just who is in > the area while charges and electronics are being armed. > > > > I think we have been pretty fortunate to have not had any serious incidents > at TCC launches, at least in my memory. Most times, we have plenty of help > at LCO and RSO and I thank those who do it on a regular and occasional basis, > but as the discussions over the new rules imply, we can always use more "eyes > on" what's happening around us. > > > > Of course these issues will continue to be discussed at future launches and > here on the chat so that all of us are on the same page and understand what > is "OK" and what is not. > > > > See you at the next launch! > > Gary Walker > > Prefect - TCC