[sugpro] Re: Near cato...what happened?

  • From: "Rick Maschek" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "rickmaschek" for DMARC)
  • To: "sugpro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sugpro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 03:21:20 +0000 (UTC)

 Tad,
How did you get this?
-12 inch long 2 inch diameter 1 inch core with total propellant mass of 806 
grams:
3.14159/4 x (25.806cm - 2.54cm) x 30.48cm =  556.96281 Total Volume
806/556.96281 =  1.4471 g/cm3 (Actual Density of propellant in question)

https://www.calculator.net/volume-calculator.html?ctankradius=1.27&ctankradiusunit=centimeters&ctanklength=30.5&ctanklengthunit=centimeters&cylcal=Calculate#cylinder




Using 806 grams, I got 1.74 g/cm3 using 463 total volume. That yields ~94.5%


    On Sunday, November 22, 2020, 04:37:03 PM PST, Kelly Jones 
<kellyjones1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
 
 I agree with your comments on compression.  Assuming a pressure of 30psi, this 
would tend to compress the voids to about one-third their original volume - 
which helps the situation, but doesn't eliminate the problem.  I use pressure 
because, for the materials I use, it seems to aid in adhesion to the liner.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 1:11 PM Rick Maschek <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

 Lots of people have indicated using compression eliminates voids. Unless 
someone does some really detailed examination, my experience with using 
compression from 5 to 50 pounds depending on the motor size, does decrease the 
size of the 'voids' but does not eliminate them. 




  
  

Other related posts: