[sugpro] Re: Besides Sugar
- From: Bruce Beck <bbeck7@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: sugpro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:47:44 -0700
I feel just the opposite from Steve.I would like to see stuff about all
types of solid propellants.One thing I've noticed about many of the
composite forums and sites is a reluctance to give detailed formulations
which I think is stupid and useless.Sugpro historically has not shown this
reluctance and I would like to see discussion of all types here.If you want
to limit yourself to only sugar propellants just ignore info about other
propellants.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Steve Peterson <steve_peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
> I wasn't around when the sugpro first started, but what I recall from
> having joined in 2004? 2006? was that discussion has historically been only
> about sugar *propellant*, since there were (and I believe still are)
> lists/forums for other propellants and other aspects of rocketry. Speaking
> just for myself and not as the moderator/owner of this list, if the list
> traffic here suddenly increased and became 90% about non-sugar stuff I
> would want to unsubscribe, because my feeling is that there are plenty of
> other venues to discuss that other stuff but not plenty of other venues to
> discuss sugar propellants. My view (personal, again) is that the goal is
> not to increase list traffic per se, it is to increase communication among
> those who are dealing with sugar propellants. That said, the old list
> (largely unmoderated) was historically pretty tolerant of the occasional
> "off topic" post/discussion as long as it was marked with "OT:".
>
> --Steve
>
>
>
> On 02/09/2015 04:30 PM, michael_r_monteith (Redacted sender
> michael_r_monteith@xxxxxxxxx for DMARC) wrote:
>
> I don't want to start a huge discussion. But would it make sense to
> discuss more than just sugar propellants? I was just thinking it might
> get a better audience since some that do sugar also does others. A lot of
> the same testing goes on. You guys do the most talking and I've been away
> for a while. It's no biggy. I could create one for others if it's going to
> be confusing. At least a way to cover all solid propellants either way.
>
> I was talking to the local club and a couple do sugars but for the most
> part other propellants. So always seems mixed group.
>
> Michael
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>
>
>
Other related posts:
