[studiorecorder] Re: Wow! I didn't know I could do that
- From: "ROB MEREDITH" <rmeredith@xxxxxxx>
- To: <studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:00:18 -0400
I would skip Very High Quality; it really is a waist of time. I should
probably remove it from the choices; all it does is frustrate people.
Just use high quality, and you should get comparable performance.
>>> David.Tanner@xxxxxxxxxxx 06/16/06 12:42PM >>>
My guess is that for saving a WAV file the saving time will be close
to the same. However, if you are talking about exporting to MP3 I
would say that SR is considerably slower.
David Tanner
Rehabilitation Program Specialist 3
Assistive Technology Specialist
Assistive Technology Department
MN State Services f/t Blind
Office- 651-642-0795 Cell- 651-270-2233
Skype name: dtat100
>>> neal.ewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 6/16/2006 11:24 AM >>>
Rob, you said, "I wonder what else we do that people need that
they
don't realize they have."
Well, as Brian pointed out to me yesterday and I can certainly
verify
it, SR opens in a mere fraction of the time it takes Sound Forge
to
open. I know, it's not a real big issue unless you do as much
editing
as I do, but it can really save some time.
I'm also just about to do another speed test between SF and SR. I
always used to save my MP3 files in SF because I could use their
high
quality save. Well, SR has the same thing. So, here goes the
test. An
hour long file sampled at 44100 and 16 bits saved in MP3 in both SF
and
SR. And I'll pick something whose quality is quite high and see if
I
can tell any difference in that as well. Of course, file size
might
tell me something too. I wonder if they will be the same? Sure,
and I
didn't have anything else to do today?
Neal
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ROB
MEREDITH
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 10:54 AM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Wow! I didn't know I could do that
You know Neal, we have never disallowed undo after saves. I can't
imagine doing it any other way. Yeah, saves take longer because of
this
in some situations. But with background saves, this is much less of
an
issue. You can work on a document all day, and as long as you
don't
close it, you can undo all at the end of the day, save the
original
somewhere else, redo all, and keep right on working!
I wonder what else we do that people need that they don't realize
they
have.
Rob Meredith
>>> neal.ewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 06/16/06 10:59AM >>>
I know, I'm breaking my rule about not properly naming the
subject.
I didn't realize until yesterday that even after I save a file, I
can go
back and undo changes I have made as long as the file is still
open.
I've been complaining that Sound Forge took this out of version 8.
Well,
it would appear that this is yet another reason to use SR. Can
Direct X
plug in support be far behind.
Oh, was that just a bit too subtle?
Thanks Rob.
Neal Ewers
Ravenswood Productions
Local phone: 608-277-1995
Toll Free: 888-544-8332
Email: neal.ewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ravenswood.org <http://www.ravenswood.org/>
Other related posts:
