Stan,
You are moderately confused.
Whatever RR is doing with what you call "blocking" is he put a RULE in his
email program to delete all emails from you. What he does affects no one
except his computer and what is on it.
What you have been doing and what you have been warned about is ADDRESSING
others in the TO: or CC: line of the emails addressed to the group.
Stop this immediately.
Dy
On Sep 25, 2017 16:26, "Redacted sender sblumen123 for DMARC" <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
DR
Your posts are confusing?
1. Didn't RR say he was blocking me because I was filling up his in-box
and you went along with it till just now?
2. Do you agree that RR just proved himself a liar by responding to 2 of
my emails as I earlier had guessed he
might not have blocked me? Same with Lee our pixiehat light weight?
3. All of a sudden you have come up with Moderator, Error Messages,
Messes, Clean Up, terms we never heard of before?
I understand that a non-member is not allowed to post on our net but
members can post messages from from non-members
to explain our points and even other's points of view which RR does
all the time.and that is free speech for the benefit of all.
Whats the mess and where is the damage?
4. Explain what duties does a moderator have?
5. Perhaps an Administrator who administrates least, administrates best?
6. Aren't you top dog and there is no one above that can take your job
away?
Stan the confused man
-----Original Message-----
From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun, Sep 24, 2017 4:04 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: PROOF BELOW THAT RR HASN'T REALLY BLOCKED ME
Stan,
To be clear and to attempt to either stop your misunderstanding or your
deliberate misinformation.
No one currently has blocked you. You have also NEVER been blocked.
Moderators - on one except me, but I offered you the job but you declined
and Owners, that's me, have the power to::
1: Moderate members so that their posts have to be manually approved.
I've done that to RR when he started insulting you and calling you names.
No list should tolerate name calling and intentional abuse of other members.
2. Unsubscribe users - similar to banning a email address. The email
address is removed by a moderator but the person can apply for membership
again.
3. Ban the email address. This has only been used for SPAM unsolicated
email - you know the stuff. But it can be used to take away the privilege
of applying for membership and/or posting to the group.
The only one currently in hot water is Stan for repeatedly posting emails
to Chuck Lemann <chucksright@xxxxxxxxx> via this email list. I've warned
him since December of last year about this. At first I manually overrode
the settings believing that Chuck was a feleaster_pipe*.*low radio
officer. He is not and he has made it clear he does NOT want to receive
emails from this group.
So if Stan sends anyone outside this group a message addressed to this
group, he is on moderation. Stan can - and I have no control over it, send
a message by BCC but the recipient can REPLY to ALL and messages will go to
this group. If Stan does this I will moderate him.
If Stan continues to do this as he has for the past nine months, I will
remove him from the list as a last resort.
I am managing this list alone, and I do not have time to moderate error
messages that are due to Stan's misuse of this list.
73
DR
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Redacted sender sblumen123 for DMARC <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Everyone
Blocking like suicide is self inflicting punishment by sock people.
Not a word about the current Vietnam series like it never happened?
In my humble opinion RR's post below is so child like sick it doesn't
require a response.
Stan the no blocking man.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sat, Sep 23, 2017 1:35 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Fwd: Re: Where is David Ring & Ristead hiding?
Stan writes:
(nowTo your previous statement of the kindly rich giving to charities you
neglected to point out that it is tax deductible, they like
to see their names on buildings like Carnegie Hall, Rockefeller Plaza
keepowned by the Japanese), Trump Tower, etc, that
they have accountants to help, that they don't become middle class but
their Mansions, Mega Yachts, carry on with their
rich life style and as usual with those kind of people, they get richer
after their generous gifts.
Stan the SOCIALIST STANDING MAN
None of the Christians I know who donate to charities have their names on
buildings. The only recognition they seek is from God.
Trump Tower is not a charity and is not tax deductible.
The Clintons showed their contempt for having charitable contributions tax
deductible by taking a tax deduction for donating Bill's used underwear.
Note: Both Hillary's and Obama's guru and inspiration was the Jew Saul
Alinsky who dedicated his book "Rules for Radicals", which is the bible for
communists in America to Lucifer. He said that Lucifer was the first
radical.
Because I am a Christian I care about other people and do what I can to
alleviate their suffering. The reason I do this is because I believe that
God has blessed me with so much happiness in life because I do this.
I have tried to explain to brainwashed communists like Stan why
socialism/communism is flawed and how it hurts people, and I have also
tried to explain that nobody hates Jews for who they are but for the the
evil things they do. But the longer I live I have to admit that most people
don't want to be helped. They come to me for money but that's all they want
- somebody to take care of them. They don't want to change their lives so
they never have to beg or steal from other people.
-RR
Users Change your settings here: //www.freelists.org/list/
sparkscoffee
Unsubscribe/Subscribe and more commands are available for you.
List owner: n1ea@xxxxxxxx
