Scotty
Wowee what a long stream of statistics in your link. Perhaps the iron
fisted
communist rulers of China has the right idea of one baby per family,
certainly
for the most populated country on our planet? So we agree on a combo of
socialisim and captalisim is the way to go? Don't hear much from the
others?
CB
-----Original Message-----
From: Dry Turtles <dryturtles@xxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, May 26, 2014 9:53 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Is China Captilist or Socialist?
CB,
You made a good point about GM. Human nature usually will shit on
other human beings
if they think they can get away with it for the love of money.
As far as a combo of Capitalism and Socialism, it's the only way to go
especially with
the world's population at 7,300 million and growing at 70 million PER
YEAR.
http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/
Scotty
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Redacted sender sblumen123@xxxxxxx
<mailto:sblumen123@xxxxxxx> for DMARC <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Scotty and anyone else
Have you noticed the DELAYED recalls of so many cars due to
faulty design most of
which the manufacturer knew of but tried t get away with because
of cost? Mistakes
are inevitable and did you notice that China itself exposed it and
executed two
and punished others to a lesser degree? The question still Is
China Captilist or Socialist?
I still say both, mostly socialist to accomplish the enormous
world wide deals they are making
planning on their future bringing other countries into their
sphere of influence while the capitalist
world connives to pay their bills. The iron fisted communists
haven't done such a bad job from
the 1930s when Japan was raping Nanking and other cities and the
capitalist world was force
selling opium for profit. The $4 an hour was true in the beginning
and the Chinese big shots
were going to work on bicycles. Now all the luxury car
manufactories and others set up shops
as Joint Ventures (always) not for export but for the Chinese
market. Got to be a whole lot of
Chinese are making a whole lot more then $4 an hour? About time
you doubters start thinking
about joining the growing millions in the socialist EVOLUTION (not
revolution).
PS: Your link was long like a book, just saying.
Still Comrade B
-----Original Message-----
From: Dry Turtles <dryturtles@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:dryturtles@xxxxxxxxx>>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Mon, May 26, 2014 10:56 am
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Is China Captilist or Socialist?
CB,
Great news as I love the taste of melamine in my milk.
The 2008 Chinese milk scandal was a food safety incident in China,
involving milk and infant formula, and other food materials and
components, adulterated with melamine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Chinese_milk_scandal
Scotty
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Redacted sender
sblumen123@xxxxxxx <mailto:sblumen123@xxxxxxx> for DMARC
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:
Everyone
If you will re-read the attachment "China investing in
Israel's food production" you will find
that China's state owned Bright Food Group Co. Ltd. has bought
56 percent of Israel's iconic
dairy firm Tnuva. In return China offers a large market and
source of funding at a time of
criticisim and a threat of boycott because of Isreal's failure
to make peace with the
Palestinians. My interpretation, read the whole think and make
your own interpetations?
One of the points is that Bright Food Group Co. Ltd is STATE
OWNED, not PRIVATE
INVESTMENT and that is socialisim in action. Also China is now
a desirable market not
just an exporter of $4 and hour low spending workers. Got it?
Think, think, think and think
again.
Comrade B
