[sparkscoffee] Re: Is China Captilist or Socialist?

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:50:16 -0400 (EDT)

Scotty
Wowee what a long stream of statistics in your link. Perhaps the iron fisted
communist rulers of China has the right idea of one baby per family, certainly
for the most populated country on our planet? So we agree on a combo of
socialisim and captalisim  is the way to go? Don't hear much from the others?

CB
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Dry Turtles <dryturtles@xxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, May 26, 2014 9:53 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Is China Captilist or Socialist?


CB,


You made a good point about GM.  Human nature usually will shit on other human 
beings
if they think they can get away with it for the love of money.


As far as a combo of Capitalism and Socialism, it's the only way to go 
especially with
the world's population at 7,300 million and growing at 70 million PER YEAR.


http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/












Scotty



On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Redacted sender sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC 
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Scotty and anyone else
Have you noticed the DELAYED recalls of so many cars due to faulty design most 
of
which the manufacturer knew of but tried t get away with because of cost? 
Mistakes
are inevitable and did you notice that China itself exposed it and executed two
and punished others to a lesser degree? The question still Is China Captilist 
or Socialist?
I still say both, mostly socialist to accomplish the enormous world wide deals 
they are making
planning on their future bringing other countries into their sphere of 
influence while the capitalist
world connives to pay their bills. The iron fisted communists haven't done such 
a bad job from
the 1930s when Japan was raping Nanking and other cities and the capitalist 
world was force
selling opium for profit. The $4 an hour was true in the beginning and the 
Chinese big shots
were going to work on bicycles. Now all the luxury car manufactories and others 
set up shops
as Joint Ventures (always) not for export but for the Chinese market. Got to be 
a whole lot of
Chinese are making a whole lot more then $4 an hour? About time you doubters 
start thinking
about joining the growing millions in the socialist EVOLUTION (not revolution).
 
PS: Your link was long like a book, just saying.
 
Still Comrade B  
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Dry Turtles <dryturtles@xxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, May 26, 2014 10:56 am
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Is China Captilist or Socialist?


CB,


Great news as I love the taste of melamine in my milk. 


The 2008 Chinese milk scandal was a food safety incident in China, involving 
milk and infant formula, and other food materials and components, adulterated 
with melamine.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Chinese_milk_scandal




Scotty



On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Redacted sender sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC 
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Everyone
If you will re-read the attachment "China investing in Israel's food 
production" you will find
that China's state owned Bright Food Group Co. Ltd. has bought 56 percent of 
Israel's iconic
dairy firm Tnuva. In return China offers a large market and source of funding 
at a time of
criticisim and a threat of boycott because of Isreal's failure to make peace 
with the
Palestinians. My interpretation, read the whole think and make your own 
interpetations?
 
One of the points is that Bright Food Group Co. Ltd is STATE OWNED, not PRIVATE
INVESTMENT and that is socialisim in action. Also China is now a desirable 
market not
just an exporter of $4 and hour low spending workers. Got it? Think, think, 
think and think
again.
 
Comrade B
 
 








Other related posts: